Openai/6959f72b-b718-8010-8a47-a350a0841e14

This conversation was exported from ChatGPT

gpt-5-2

User: Computer Architecture without RAM

Computer Architecture without RAM

Assistant: Computer Architecture Without RAM refers to systems that operate without conventional random-access memory, or with ext…

Computer Architecture Without RAM refers to systems that operate without conventional random-access memory, or with extremely minimal volatile memory. These architectures exist and are useful in specific domains, though they differ significantly from modern general-purpose computers.

Below is a structured explanation.

Strictly speaking, no RAM at all is rare. Most systems need some working storage. In practice, “without RAM” usually means:

• No separate, addressable main memory
• No large volatile memory
• Execution happens directly from non-volatile storage
• State is stored in registers, ROM, or external media

###

Program runs directly from ROM/Flash.

Architecture

• CPU
• ROM / Flash (instructions + constants)
• Registers only (or tiny scratchpad)

Characteristics

• No RAM stack or heap
• Variables stored in registers or Flash
• Extremely deterministic

Used in

• Early computers
• Microcontrollers
• Embedded bootloaders

Example

• AVR microcontrollers running entirely from Flash
• PIC microcontrollers (low-end models)

All computation happens in CPU registers.

Architecture

• CPU with many registers
• ROM for instructions
• No writable memory

Limitations

• No recursion
• No dynamic data structures
• Very limited program size

Used in

• Educational CPUs
• Ultra-simple controllers
• Early calculators

Stack is implemented inside the CPU itself.

Architecture

• Hardware stack (fixed depth)
• ROM for code
• No external RAM

Used in

• Forth machines
• JavaCard-like smart cards (early designs)

Separate instruction and data paths, but data memory is absent or read-only.

Architecture

• Instruction ROM
• Optional I/O registers
• No writable data memory

Used in

• Control systems
• Finite-state machines

The computer is essentially a large FSM.

Architecture

• Hardwired logic
• State registers
• No memory in the classical sense

Used in

• Digital controllers
• ASICs
• Protocol engines

Uses slow non-volatile storage instead of RAM.

Examples

• EEPROM as working memory
• Flash with wear-leveling
• Disk-only early computers

Tradeoffs

• Extremely slow writes
• Limited endurance
• Complex software

| | | |

| --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

###

• Finite state machines
• Loop unrolling
• Register reuse
• Compile-time allocation
• No recursion
• No dynamic memory

- Assembly

• Forth
• C (restricted subset)
• State-machine DSLs

- Extremely low power

• High reliability
• Deterministic timing
• Instant boot
• Radiation tolerant (space systems)

- Very limited complexity

• Hard to program
• No multitasking
• No dynamic memory
• Poor scalability

- Ultra-low-power IoT

• Implantable medical devices
• Space probes
• Secure hardware (smart cards)
• Boot ROMs

====

+-----------+ ====
|   ROM     | --> Instructions
+-----------+
       |
+-----------+
|   CPU     | --> Registers only
+-----------+
       |
+-----------+
|   I/O     |
+-----------+

A computer without RAM is possible, but it ceases to be a general-purpose computer and becomes a specialized, deterministic machine. RAM is what enables flexibility, multitasking, and complex software.

If you want, I can:

• Design a theoretical no-RAM CPU
• Compare Von Neumann vs Harvard without RAM
• Show assembly code examples
• Explain how C works without RAM
• Discuss security implications

Just tell me what angle you want.

User: Okay.

Okay. Now RAM is extremely expensive. So we need to create new architecture. Without RAM. But it should be as effective as with RAM. Or even better!

Assistant: This is a great systems question — and it forces us to separate what RAM actually provides from how we can get those be…

This is a great systems question — and it forces us to separate what RAM actually provides from how we can get those benefits differently.

I’ll answer in a serious, architectural way (not hand-wavy), and I’ll be explicit about what can and cannot be matched.

Premise Clarified

You want an architecture where:

• Conventional RAM is extremely expensive or unavailable
• The system is as effective as RAM-based systems, or better
• This implies: - High performance - General-purpose computation - Reasonable programmability - Multitasking / large programs - Fast data access

So the goal is not “no memory”, but no RAM.

That distinction is critical.

Step 1: What RAM Actually Gives Us

RAM provides four key properties:

1. Low-latency random access
2. High write endurance
3. Byte-level mutability
4. Uniform address space

Any “RAM-less” architecture must replace these properties, not eliminate them.

Step 2: Core Insight — RAM Is an Optimization, Not a Requirement

A Turing machine doesn’t need RAM. But performance does.

So the solution is:

Replace RAM with multiple specialized, cheaper, more efficient memory forms + architectural changes

Not one memory. A memory system.

The New Architecture: RAM-less, but Not Memory-less

I’ll call this:

SOMA: Spatially Organized Memory Architecture

This is a realistic, buildable concept.

1. Massive Register Files (Primary Working State)

Replace:

• Stack
• Hot variables
• Short-lived objects

With:

• Thousands to millions of registers

Key idea:

Registers become addressable memory, not just CPU temporaries.

R0 ... R1048575

How?

• Banked register files
• Compiler-managed allocation
• Hardware renaming

Benefits:

• Faster than RAM
• Deterministic
• No cache misses
• Zero refresh cost

Modern CPUs already do this internally — we just expose it architecturally.

2. Scratchpad Memory (Not RAM)

Instead of RAM:

• Explicitly managed SRAM blocks
• No caching
• No page faults

Used in:

• GPUs
• DSPs
• AI accelerators

Properties:

• Small
• Fast
• Predictable
• Cheap

Why better than RAM?

• No coherence overhead
• No cache hierarchy
• Compiler controls data movement

3. Persistent Working Memory (Flash / MRAM / ReRAM)

This replaces heap + cold data.

Key change:

• Non-volatile memory becomes writable working storage
• Architecture tolerates slow writes by design

Techniques:

• Log-structured updates
• Copy-on-write
• Append-only data
• Persistent pointers

Result:

• Instant boot
• Crash consistency
• No RAM refresh power

Databases already do this in software. We move it into hardware.

4. Execution Model Shift: Dataflow + Message Passing

Instead of:

Load → Modify → Store

Use:

Trigger → Compute → Emit

Effects:

• No need for mutable shared memory
• No need for large stacks
• Naturally parallel

Hardware:

• Actor model
• Mailboxes instead of heap
• Hardware queues

5. Hardware Stack Frames (No Stack RAM)

Stacks are RAM-hungry.

Replace with:

• Fixed-size hardware call frames
• Spill to persistent memory if needed

Like:

• JVM stack
• WebAssembly
• Forth machines

6. No Caches. Ever.

Caches exist only because RAM is slow.

Remove RAM → remove caches.

Benefits:

• Predictable latency
• Simpler silicon
• Lower power
• No cache coherence bugs

7. Memory Is Spatial, Not Flat

RAM gives the illusion of:

0x00000000 → 0xFFFFFFFF

We replace this with:

• Region-based addressing
• Typed memory
• Capability-based access

REGION_A.variables
REGION_B.objects
REGION_C.messages

Programming Model

Languages:

• Rust-like ownership
• Functional languages
• Dataflow DSLs
• Restricted C

Forbidden:

• Arbitrary pointer arithmetic
• Unbounded recursion
• Implicit allocation

Encouraged:

• Region lifetimes
• Explicit data movement
• Compile-time memory planning

Performance: Can It Match RAM?

Yes — and sometimes exceed it.

Faster than RAM:

• Hot data (registers)
• Tight loops
• Real-time systems
• Parallel workloads
• Energy efficiency

Slower than RAM:

• Random writes to large datasets
• Legacy software
• Poorly structured algorithms

But note:

Modern systems already don’t “use RAM directly” — they fight caches constantly.

Real-World Proof This Works

This is not theoretical:

• GPUs (no coherent RAM)
• Google TPUs
• Apple Neural Engine
• Network processors
• SmartNICs
• Datacenter storage engines
• Spacecraft computers

They outperform RAM-based CPUs by abandoning RAM assumptions.

Radical Result: RAM Was the Wrong Abstraction

RAM is:

• Expensive
• Power-hungry
• Hard to scale
• Poor for parallelism

Your architecture is better if:

• Memory is explicit
• State is persistent
• Computation is localized
• Data movement is visible

Summary Architecture Diagram

+---------------------+
|   Compute Tiles     |
|  (Registers + FSM)  |
+----------+----------+
           |
+---------------------+
| Scratchpad Regions  |
+----------+----------+
           |
+---------------------+
| Persistent Memory   |
| (Flash/MRAM/ReRAM)  |
+----------+----------+
           |
+---------------------+
| Message Fabric      |
+---------------------+

The Big Claim

A RAM-less architecture can outperform RAM-based systems if software is designed for locality, persistence, and explicit dataflow.

RAM didn’t make computers powerful. Architectural discipline did — and then RAM hid the cost.

If you want, next we can:

• Design a concrete ISA
• Show how malloc disappears
• Port Linux-like abstractions
• Compare energy / cost / performance
• Design a compiler for this model

Tell me how deep you want to go.