Jump to content

Openai/69352cb3-9304-8007-8a62-eb22c05b75f7

From freem


This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]

gpt-5-1[edit | edit source]

User: How does USB to LAN work and is there any benefit in using actual network hardware say a VLAN switch.[edit | edit source]

How does USB to LAN work and is there any benefit in using actual network hardware say a VLAN switch. Show in table format

Assistant: Below is a clear explanation how USB-to-LAN adapters work, how they differ from real network hardware, and when each is…[edit | edit source]

Below is a clear explanation how USB-to-LAN adapters work, how they differ from real network hardware, and when each is appropriate — all summarized in a comparison table.

✅ How USB-to-LAN Works (Simplified Explanation)[edit | edit source]

A USB-to-LAN adapter is essentially a tiny external network card. Inside it, there is:

  • A USB-to-Ethernet controller chip (e.g., Realtek RTL8153, AX88179, etc.)
  • A PHY (physical layer) transceiver
  • A small buffer & MAC address module

Your PC sends/receives network packets through USB, and the adapter converts them into Ethernet frames.

📌 Important: These adapters rely on your computer’s USB bus for bandwidth, power, and processing. They do not do hardware switching, routing, VLAN handling, or QoS by themselves.

🆚 USB-to-LAN Adapter vs. Actual Network Hardware (Switch, Router, VLAN Switch)[edit | edit source]

Here’s a comparison table:

!https://www\.projectgus\.com/wp\-content/uploads/2013/03/usbethernet\-9489\.jpg?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com[2] !https://www\.researchgate\.net/publication/228586141/figure/fig1/AS%3A393796077539330%401470899709135/Typical\-switch\-internal\-architecture\.png?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com[3] !https://pcnautic\.com/wp\-content/uploads/rtl8153\.png?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com[4] 4 | Feature / Function | USB-to-LAN Adapter | Actual Network Hardware (Switch / VLAN Switch) | | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Primary Purpose | Adds a network port to a PC or device | Connects multiple devices in a network | | Where processing happens | Mostly on the computer CPU | Dedicated switching ASIC chips | | Performance Stability | Can fluctuate depending on USB load | Extremely stable | | Speed Options | Typically 100Mbps or 1Gbps (some 2.5GbE) | 1G, 2.5G, 10G, 40G depending on model | | Supports VLAN tagging | Only pass-through (no VLAN management) | Full VLAN management (tag/untag, trunk/access) | | Hardware Switching | ❌ None | ✔️ Yes | | QoS / Rate Limiting | ❌ None | ✔️ Yes | | Spanning Tree, LACP, IGMP Snooping | ❌ No support | ✔️ Supported on managed switches | | Port Isolation | ❌ No | ✔️ Yes | | Multiple Ports | Only 1 | 5–48 ports depending on switch | | Use in Real Networks | Temporary, client-side, basic use | Core, distribution, access layer networking | | Latency | Higher, affected by USB bus | Very low (ASIC-based forwarding) | | CPU Load | Can increase because USB frames need host processing | Minimal load on connected devices | | Reliability | Good for simple setups | Excellent; designed for 24/7 operation | | Best Use Case | Laptop lacking LAN, emergency port, lightweight network use | Real networks, VLAN segmentation, enterprise setups, Piso WiFi, AdoPiSoft, MikroTik, etc. |

📝 Summary: When to Use Which[edit | edit source]

✅ USB-to-LAN Adapter is good for:[edit | edit source]
  • Laptops with no Ethernet port
  • Temporary connection to configure devices (routers/APs)
  • Backup interface for troubleshooting
  • Light network traffic (≤ 1Gbps)
❌ USB-to-LAN is NOT recommended for:[edit | edit source]
  • VLAN trunking
  • Running a network backbone
  • Connecting switching or routing equipment
  • Throughput-sensitive tasks (e.g., PPPoE servers, AdoPiSoft, Mikrotik traffic)

⭐ Benefits of a Real VLAN-Capable Switch[edit | edit source]

A real switch — especially an L2/L3 managed switch — provides:

  • Hardware-based switching (line rate)
  • VLAN segmentation
  • Trunk & access modes
  • MAC tables, STP, LACP
  • QoS & CoDel queues (model-dependent)
  • Broadcast storm control
  • IGMP snooping (important for IPTV)
  • Multi-port scalability
  • Reliability (no USB bottlenecks)

👑 Final Verdict[edit | edit source]

If your goal is real networking, especially VLAN-based setups like your AdoPiSoft + MikroTik + Ruijie system:

A USB-LAN adapter is not a substitute for proper network hardware.
It is only a single-port NIC, not a switch.

A VLAN switch gives you control, performance, reliability, and expandability — the USB adapter cannot.

If you'd like, I can also create:

✅ A diagram comparing packet flow on USB-LAN vs. real switch ✅ A compatibility table for your TL-SG105E, Ruijie, and MikroTik VLAN setup ✅ A recommended switch topology for your dual-ISP + Vendo WiFi environment

Would you like that?

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "USB to LAN comparison". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2025-12-07.
  2. "https://www\.projectgus\.com/wp\-content/uploads/2013/03/usbethernet\-9489\.jpg?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com". projectgus.com. Retrieved 2025-12-07. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  3. "https://www\.researchgate\.net/publication/228586141/figure/fig1/AS%3A393796077539330%401470899709135/Typical\-switch\-internal\-architecture\.png?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com". images.openai.com. Retrieved 2025-12-07. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  4. "https://pcnautic\.com/wp\-content/uploads/rtl8153\.png?utm\_source=chatgpt\.com". pcnautic.com. Retrieved 2025-12-07. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)