Jump to content

Openai/696a9f9f-7fac-800b-8dd9-d6eb037f71e6

From freem
Revision as of 05:26, 17 January 2026 by Lukegao (talk | contribs) (by freem.ai...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]

gpt-5-2[edit | edit source]

User: is RAID a backup[edit | edit source]

is RAID a backup

Assistant: No.[edit | edit source]

No.

RAID is not a backup. It is a high-availability and fault-tolerance mechanism, nothing more.

Here is the plain reality:

  • What RAID does: Keeps a system online when a disk fails. It protects against single-disk hardware failure depending on the RAID level.
  • What RAID does not do: - It does not protect against accidental deletion - It does not protect against file corruption - It does not protect against ransomware - It does not protect against malware - It does not protect against user error - It does not protect against catastrophic failure (controller, PSU, firmware bugs, fire, theft) - It does not preserve historical versions

If you delete a file, RAID deletes it faster across every disk. If ransomware encrypts your data, RAID faithfully mirrors the damage. If the filesystem corrupts itself, RAID preserves the corruption perfectly.

That is why old-school storage admins have always said:

RAID protects uptime. Backups protect data.
What actually counts as a backup[edit | edit source]

A real backup must meet at least these criteria:

  • A separate copy of the data
  • Stored on different media or system
  • Ideally offline or immutable
  • Supports versioning and point-in-time recovery

Examples:

  • External drives rotated and disconnected
  • Another NAS with snapshot replication
  • Cloud backup with object locking
  • Tape (still used for a reason)
Correct mental model[edit | edit source]
  • RAID = seatbelt
  • Backup = spare life

You want both. One does not replace the other.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "RAID vs Backup". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2026-01-17.