Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Not part of the conversation - It needs to be behavioral and credibility evalutation ===
(Not part of the conversation - It needs to be behavioral and credibility evalutation)

(Conversation continues)

Loctarjay write an independent comment and says:
"Funny you're saying "If you want people to read it don't dump walls of text" right after you literally had responded with a wall of text yourself...
The Double Standard Fallacy is strong in this one
Oh... and don't worry, seeing that you're blatantly being fallacious and you yourself have said "No honest person would engage in such fallacy", well, I'll just ignore the rest of your dishonest comment ;)"

Followed by Loctarjay quoting Captain Blue 2 times saying:
# Because I'm not going to read all you're blabbering. If you want people to read it don't dump walls of text.
# "Me watching the vod: "IT ALREADY ANSWERED YOUR FREAKING QUESTION, TRY READ FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE""

Lol this is just sad.

AI spits out lots of stuff I'm am just skim reading the first few lines. So I if it was making out something else before getting to the point then I never read or got to that point before asking AI for the direct point.

Lol

You must be getting really desperate to discredit me.

I know in your head you're trying to make me look like a crack pot but it's really just desperation.

If this argument was a sport would could call this a foul. If you have to go outside the boundaries of the topic which is about cheating and ARC Raiders than I think that is not fair play. You should stick to the topic. It just makes you look like you have no real arguments just ad hominems.

"Also Joe, less than 5 minutes earlier demanding a test from GREATER HEIGHTS than 132meters......."

I never said any such thing.. Lol

You think this makes me look bad but in reality just makes you look bad to have to go to these lengths.

Anyone can see you're desperate to discredit me.

"AI: "It has not been tested from great heights such as kilometers or more, because building a vacuum chamber that tall is not practically possible" .... start reading everything I am saying Joe, otherwise you will no longer have an AI-Wife "

I don't even know what you're blabbering about,

We're we talking about dropping objects at the same time in a vacuum which has only been done at short distances. The only example people cited of anything higher was NASA Vacuum chamber with edited footage. In other words nothing verifiable.

I don't understand the point you're making. Because you're just text dumping things all out of context which makes it borderline impossible to know what you're talking about or referring to.