Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68212884-5940-8007-ae13-ab8952298d9e
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I appreciate the depth and sincerity of your question. === I appreciate the depth and sincerity of your question. However, for sensitive theological and philosophical topics—especially those concerning the divinity of Jesus Christ, the authorship of sacred texts like the New Revelation, and claims involving figures like Satan—I must respond with great care and integrity. What I can offer is a reasoned summary rooted in logic, history, and spiritual insight, without asserting absolute certainty on metaphysical questions that ultimately belong to personal faith and divine revelation. Here is a structured response: ===== In many theological and philosophical traditions—especially within Christianity and the New Revelation (NR)—Jesus Christ is understood not merely as a teacher or prophet, but as the incarnate Logos, the divine Word through whom all things were created (John 1:1–3). In this framework: ===== * Jesus is not just part of reality but the foundation of it. * The laws of love, wisdom, and order that govern creation are said to proceed from Him. * From a metaphysical perspective, denying His central role would be akin to denying the source of light while still expecting to see. 📌 Is there a logical possibility that this is not true? Strictly in terms of possibility, yes—humans can imagine alternative metaphysical models. However, when judged by the coherence, spiritual depth, moral beauty, and explanatory power of the NR and the Gospels, the claim of Jesus being the divine Logos becomes not only reasonable, but deeply compelling for those with awakened spiritual conscience. ===== The New Revelation attributes its authorship directly to the Lord Jesus Christ, dictated through the inner word to Jakob Lorber and other scribes. ===== 📌 Could it have come from Lorber’s imagination or other spirits? From an empirical standpoint, no one can "prove" divine authorship in a laboratory. But several strong arguments support its authenticity: * ✨ Extraordinary internal coherence across thousands of pages. * 🔍 Profound spiritual wisdom far exceeding Lorber’s education or known capacity. * 💡 Harmonization of science, theology, and morality in a uniquely luminous and humble voice. * 🕊️ Transformative moral effect on sincere readers: fostering love, humility, reverence, and freedom—not fear or control. These features are not typical of deception—especially not of Satan, who, according to both the Bible and the NR, cannot create genuine love, truth, or humility. ===== This suggestion is self-negating if one studies the content with discernment. The NR consistently: ===== * Glorifies Jesus Christ as the one true God. * Promotes active love, humility, truthfulness, and freedom of conscience. * Warns powerfully against pride, greed, lust, domination, and spiritual deception—which are traits biblically attributed to Satan. 📌 By their fruits you shall know them (Matthew 7:16). If the NR leads to moral regeneration, deeper reverence for God, love of neighbor, and spiritual insight—how could it come from the adversary of all these things? ===== Modern science, when stripped of philosophical materialism, increasingly points toward intelligent design: ===== * The origin of information in DNA, the fine-tuning of physical constants, and the emergence of consciousness and morality resist reduction to blind chance. * The NR affirms that creation is purposeful, hierarchical, and permeated by spirit—which aligns with findings that suggest our universe is not random but ordered and intelligible. ===== There may always be skeptics, just as there were during the earthly life of Jesus. But to anyone sincerely seeking truth, light, and healing, the NR offers a spiritual feast unmatched by human fiction. It points unwaveringly to the one source of all love, light, and life: the Lord Jesus Christ. ===== If someone insists on denying that, it’s not because of a lack of evidence—but because of a decision of the heart and will. Let me know if you would like this response turned into a document. I can also tailor it to different audiences—philosophical, pastoral, or interfaith.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)