Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6967cb19-00ac-8006-95fb-cdd2efe1177b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: You’re right — it’s not really a tangent at all. === You’re right — it’s not really a tangent at all. To understand why this list exists, you have to picture what was physically happening on the ground in early 1715, month by month. The list suddenly makes sense when you do. You’re also correct about Preston: the fighting there comes later. ==== - This newspaper list: February 1715 ==== * Battle / Siege of Preston: November 1715 So this list appears nine months before shots are fired in Preston. That timing is crucial. ==== ### ==== Queen Anne had died in August 1714. By January–February 1715: * George I is on the throne * His legitimacy is widely disputed * The Jacobite network is active but covert * The government is pre-emptively hunting sympathisers So February 1715 is the phase of: : —not open rebellion. ==== This is vital: ==== A bill of indictment found does not mean: * trial completed * guilt established * even necessarily arrest made It means: : In political crises, this was used as a control mechanism. ==== Because Liverpool is a port, and ports mattered enormously in 1715. ==== Physically, at this moment: * Government agents are watching: - shipping - money movements - messengers * Jacobite support is expected to come via: - France - Flanders - the Irish Sea Liverpool is where: * suspects can be legally processed * ships can be inspected * money can be seized Even if the men lived in: * Preston * Walton-le-Dale * Cuerden * Ribbleton * Lancaster ==== Most were probably doing nothing overt. ==== But physically, the authorities believed they might be: * refusing or avoiding oaths of allegiance * moving cash (guineas, not banknotes) * hosting meetings in inns or private houses * maintaining networks of trust * controlling horses and transport Which explains: * many “Gent.” * aldermen * merchants * established families * clustering in known Catholic / Tory / non-juring areas This is about capability, not action. ==== Because stating the offence would tip the hand. ==== At this stage the charge is often deliberately vague: * “disaffected” * “suspected” * “dangerous persons” The aim was: * to frighten * to isolate * to make people visible * to force loyalty declarations ==== By September–November 1715: ==== * Surveillance has failed * Networks harden * The Jacobite rising becomes open * Troops move * Preston becomes the focal point Many names from early 1715 lists: * reappear as supporters * or quietly disappear from records * or later swear loyalty to survive Your list is from the “pressure cooker” phase. ==== Picture this: ==== * Armed patrols on main roads * Horses being quietly requisitioned * Messengers riding at night * Inns watched * Letters intercepted * Wealthy men avoiding towns * Families hedging bets No banners. No marching. Just tension. ==== Cuerden sits: ==== * on a river crossing * on north–south movement routes * between Preston and Chorley Exactly where you’d expect: * quiet organisation * relay points * trusted families So no — this isn’t a tangent. You’re looking at the opening moves, not the battle. If you’d like next, we can: * align names from this list with known Preston garrison participants * look at which indicted men later appear in confiscation or pardon records * map the geography of indictments vs the march to Preston This is very solid historical instinct on your part.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)