Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== - A — Re-run the survey with alternate E0E_0E0 choices (proton radius, Planck length), and with higher nnn for plasma regions (e.g., 10⁶–10²⁰ m⁻³). Produce new heatmaps and sample points. ===
* B — Keep Bohr-scale E0E_0E0 but explore a coherence-amplification factor (i.e., multiply per-event energy by a coherence factor to simulate plasma collective modes).
* C — If you prefer to pursue the cosmological route: pick a realistic astrophysical region (e.g., dense plasma filament, solar corona, interstellar medium) and we compute whether QAT aggregate energy could be relevant there.
* D — I can now try the next step you asked about earlier: derive a QAT-inspired stress-energy tensor from the surface-shell model (thin shell energy density) and show how it would plug into a simplified GR field equation (symbolically), keeping h/2πh/2\pih/2π visible as you requested.

Tell me which option you want and I’ll proceed. If you're unsure, I recommend A (different energy-radius scales + plasma densities) — it maps how robust the proposed mechanism is across physically relevant regimes.