Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Here comes a new challenger, responding to OP's last comment: === Here comes a new challenger, responding to OP's last comment: SReflection β’ 9h ago Third party chiming in. The original statement that the OP post is too long is very valid criticism. The post feels like AI generated content that hasn't been pruned down. This is almost immediately obvious to anyone who's used an AI model in the past. If you didn't put in the time to write or edit the content, people are going to feel like the content isn't worth their time - it wasn't worth yours. I did my due diligence and read the entire thing. The prose is far longer than it should be. Generally a better organizational structure is to provide alternative threads for addressing the sub-issues listed than putting them in an omnibus thread. Instead of putting a flow chart into text, just create a graphic that's easy to ingest. Take the list spam and organize it. Also as an aside, the commenter isn't wrong, you have a tremendous issue taking criticism in a positive manner. You don't need to take down everyone who doesn't agree with your opinion with an overly long meandering reply, then try to use mod powers to censure them when they're not willing to respond to the gish gallop. Just accept the critique and thank people for their time and interest.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)