Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/694057b6-101c-8007-9a65-c40578c7252d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== This is a good pattern. I’d frame it as a control-signaling channel: the model can emit machine-readable “flags” without you having to run another model to interpret raw text. ==== ===== You’ve got two clean options: ===== A) Control tools (OpenAI function-calling schema, but intercepted) * You include a small set of special functions in the tools list, e.g.: - signal_issue(code, detail, severity) - request_escalation(reason, summary) - declare_outcome(outcome_code) * The worker intercepts these calls and does not send tool results back (or sends an empty ack and immediately ends, depending on your preference). * The request returns with signals=[...] alongside text. This keeps “format familiarity” high for the model (since it already understands tool calling). B) Structured footer block (no tools) * BIOS instructs the model to optionally end with a block like: - ===CONTROL=== {json...} ===/CONTROL=== * Worker parses and strips it, and stores the JSON as signals. This is simpler if your backend’s tool-calling behavior is inconsistent. ===== - “I’m uncertain / likely wrong” → route to a verifier model ===== * “Need external data” → route to a browsing-capable model * “Output too long / summarization requested” → route to summarizer * “Potential policy risk / sensitive content” → route to a safety review model * “Tooling limitation encountered” → route to an alternate worker ===== Treat signals as hints, not authority: ===== * models will sometimes over/under-trigger * your orchestrator should combine signals with objective checks (timeouts, loop detector, max tokens reached, etc.) ===== - Signals are optional and bounded (max count per request, max size). ===== * Each signal has stable fields: - type (issue/escalation/outcome) - code (enum) - severity (low/med/high) - summary (short string) - meta (small dict, optional) * Worker returns them in request result/status, even if the text is empty. If you like, the next step in requirements is to define: # the exact repeated-line thresholds you want as defaults, and # the initial code enum for control signals (keep it tiny at first—like 8–12 codes—so it stays reliable).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)