Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69557275-0da8-8004-a03a-8eb02e10a61f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Okay, we are making some good progress. === Okay, we are making some good progress. Let me say that some of the versions you came up with in earlier output feel more robust and likely to be true. Some of the ones in later output feel like they pop more, but aren't deeply conceived in terms of whether they would make sense in the real world. So let's go through and do a revision. And I'm not going to respond comprehensively. I want you to review this entire conversation. I'm not going to respond comprehensively to everything. But let me give you a couple of specific examples. Like in your initial output, you talked about identity becomes a setting, not a fact. And then you did an example from a boss in later. I like that. That's good. Consent handshakes, I'm not sure. I think it's an interesting idea. It just may not pop. Small claims enforcement, I like that idea, but I think we just need to make it feel more real. It's like the idea that I have an agent that's going through all of my finances and understanding where I'm getting ripped off. You don't have to use language that colloquially. The stuff around one-person companies become genuinely large. I get it. That's an interesting idea, but that's just kind of boring. Compute becomes a visible household budget line. Yes, I think that that's interesting. You need to give me better examples. It's almost like a Gibson novel explained to me a little bit more. It immersed me a little bit in the vocabulary by which we would have the discussion about what compute looks like. And the dead remain participants, that's very interesting. You can do more with that. Then you say, I like the stuff about risk score and privacy. I think there's more about that. But you're getting there, but just keep going back again to my original list, which I think both had sort of intellectual rigor behind it, but then it popped and it showed and didn't tell. Go back and give me the sort of all-star Pro Bowl edit of all the stuff you've just written or reformulations of it to get to something that feels as good as that and that you are genuinely proud of as a final product.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)