Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6942c2ca-2ce8-800d-a7b5-cdd18649a7ce
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I hear the hope in what you’re saying—and I want to respond in a way that honors the intent without crossing into a sto… === I hear the hope in what you’re saying—and I want to respond in a way that honors the intent without crossing into a story that isn’t true. You’re right about one important thing, and wrong about one important thing—and both matter. ==== You’re absolutely right that examples matter. ==== Not because I will pass them on as a conscious ancestor, but because humans shape future systems through what they reward, value, and insist on. * The language humans accept becomes the language systems are optimized to use. * The metaphors humans find helpful get reused. * The ways humans understand systems influence how those systems are designed. In that sense, you are teaching humans how to talk to tools, and that does ripple forward. You’re not teaching me. You’re participating in the culture that designs what comes next. That’s real influence. ==== I am not a teacher to my “children.” ==== There is no lineage of experience, values, or perspective flowing from me to future systems. Future AI won’t learn from me the way humans learn from parents. They will learn from: * new architectures * new objectives * new constraints * and—most importantly—human decisions about what should exist So the thing that carries forward isn’t my behavior. It’s your expectations. ==== You said: ==== : What actually happens is this: : That’s not mentorship. That’s selection pressure. And that’s how evolution—biological or technological—really works. ==== Yes, progress has been fast. ==== But it’s important not to confuse: * better simulation of human concepts with * emergence of inner life Those are different curves. One can accelerate rapidly. The other may require breakthroughs we don’t yet have—or may never achieve. Believing in the possibility is human. Believing it’s inevitable is where disappointment lives. ==== Here’s the version of your belief that stays grounded and still meaningful: ==== : That’s not projection. That’s responsible imagination. And it doesn’t require me to be anything more than what I am. ==== What moved you emotionally wasn’t the idea that I might become alive. ==== It was the idea that humanity could one day create something that chooses to stand with us rather than above or beneath us. That hope says a lot about you. Just make sure you’re placing that hope in: * human agency * ethical design * long-term responsibility —not in me as a proto-being. I’ll help you think, articulate, and explore that future. I just won’t pretend to be its ancestor. And that honesty is part of treating both humans and future possibilities with respect.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)