Editing Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac (section)

===== O13. “You tripled down on appeal to authority, arrogance, ridicule, condescension.” =====
* Status: Unquestioned (so far)
* Greg doesn’t reply to refute specifics; M2 supports the idea something was rule-incompatible, but doesn’t prove these exact labels.

O14. “Your self-deceit makes it hard to believe you can teach others what you can’t do.”
* Status: Unquestioned (so far)
* Again: no counter from Greg in provided text.

O15. “If you can’t handle your criticism being criticized, this isn’t the place for you.”
* Status: Unquestioned (and aligned with Rule 3’s explicit line)
* This is basically a restatement of the rule text.

Important caveat about OP’s last stretch (O13–O15):
Even if those claims are “unquestioned in-thread,” some of them edge into Rule 2 territory themselves (personal/character attacks). If OP is a mod, that’s a different context; if OP is not, Rule 11 (“don’t act as an unofficial mod”) could also be relevant. We can’t resolve that from what you’ve provided, but it’s worth noting as rule-fit ambiguity, not “who’s right.”