Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6944461c-7f90-8000-8c32-54fe2958dd9a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Here’s the best available evidence on how the incidence of myocarditis a key serious adverse event after COVID-19 vacci… === Here’s the best available evidence on how the incidence of myocarditis (a key serious adverse event) after COVID-19 vaccination in U.S. military personnel compares to background (pre-COVID) rates — expressed in relative, percentage terms — based on published surveillance data: ===== A JAMA Cardiology analysis of U.S. Military Health System records reported: ===== * Observed myocarditis cases after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: 19 among male service members who received 436 000 second doses. * Expected myocarditis based on background rates: estimated 0–8 cases in that same subgroup. '' That implies the observed number was ''higher than expected* relative to historical baseline. JAMA Network<ref>{{cite web|title=JAMA Network|url=https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601|publisher=JAMA Network|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> To approximate the relative change compared to expected background: * Using the midpoint expected value (4 cases) vs observed (19): → [(19 − 4) / 4] × 100 ≈ +375% more cases than expected. This is an indicative relative increase (not exact incidence per person-year). JAMA Network<ref>{{cite web|title=JAMA Network|url=https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601|publisher=JAMA Network|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> Important nuance: this doesn’t mean all were caused by the vaccine — it means the number of cases was above baseline expectations given the size of the vaccinated population. JAMA Network<ref>{{cite web|title=JAMA Network|url=https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601|publisher=JAMA Network|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> ===== A DoD report comparing myocarditis incidence before and after the vaccine requirement found: ===== * Crude myocarditis incidence after vaccination (within 21 days): ~40.6 per 100 000 person-years * Crude myocarditis incidence without vaccination: ~17.1 per 100 000 person-years * So the vaccinated group’s rate was ~2.4× higher — which is about a '''140% increase''' relative to the unvaccinated military baseline. Military Health System<ref>{{cite web|title=Military Health System|url=https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2023/09/29/DOD-Report-on-Cardiac-and-Kidney-Issues-in-Service-Members-Prior-to-and-Following-the-COVID-Vaccine-Requirement|publisher=Military Health System|date=2023-09-29|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> ===== For context (not military-specific numbers but relevant for interpretation): ===== * Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection was far more elevated (e.g., ~152.1 per 100 000 person-years) than after vaccination (~40.6 per 100 000 person-years) in the same DoD dataset — roughly ~10× higher with infection. Military Health System<ref>{{cite web|title=Military Health System|url=https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2023/09/29/DOD-Report-on-Cardiac-and-Kidney-Issues-in-Service-Members-Prior-to-and-Following-the-COVID-Vaccine-Requirement|publisher=Military Health System|date=2023-09-29|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> ===== 1. Different denominators & methods: Military analyses often compare expected based on background rates (historical) vs observed post-vaccine cases — not always clean case-control designs. ===== # Rare events: Even a 300–400% relative increase can reflect very small absolute numbers (dozens of cases per ~100 000 people). # Causality ≠ incidence difference: Observed excess above historical expectation doesn’t by itself prove vaccination caused the increase; it flags a signal for further study. # Infection effects dominate: COVID-19 infection itself carries a higher myocarditis risk, which complicates thinking about relative changes pre- vs post-pandemic and pre- vs post-vaccination. ===== | | | ===== | --- | --- | | | | | | | But in absolute terms this still represents a rare outcome (tens of cases per 100 000 person-years), and COVID-19 infection alone increases myocarditis risk far more in military populations than vaccination does. Military Health System<ref>{{cite web|title=Military Health System|url=https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2023/09/29/DOD-Report-on-Cardiac-and-Kidney-Issues-in-Service-Members-Prior-to-and-Following-the-COVID-Vaccine-Requirement|publisher=Military Health System|date=2023-09-29|access-date=2025-12-20}}</ref> If you’d like, I can help you visualize these relative changes with a simple chart or translate this into a concise paragraph suitable for publication.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)