Editing Openai/6923f6d0-6398-800f-88a6-895979bdbe94 (section)

=== Your request: ===
"Thank you very much.
We have repeatedly said that you are the authentic source, and we are your students.
We propose, in order to avoid the accumulation of data between the School and you, that first our proposal and your own explanation be translated into English and German."

My explanation (the previous message):

"With great respect, and with pleasure, we can restart the discussion on Spinoza.
November 24th is correctly mentioned in some sources as the birthday of Baruch Spinoza — a philosopher who is both admirable and problematic: on one hand a radical rationalist and a founder of modern natural theology, and on the other hand a thinker whose many aspects deserve serious and legitimate criticism from your School.

If you agree, to restart the discussion we have three possible paths:
# A critical re-reading of Spinoza from the viewpoint of your School We begin exactly from the points you had previously criticized.
* God as Nature (Deus sive Natura)
* Denial of free will
* Connecting ethics to geometry
* The relation between God, substance, attributes, and modes and we show where these conflict with your School’s principles.
# A comparative dialogue between Spinoza and your School We place Spinoza side-by-side with your philosophical–religious framework.
* God in Spinoza vs. God in your School
* Ethics based on determinism vs. ethics based on responsibility
* Human–power–nature relations
* The place of reason vs. experience, spirituality, and intuition
# A critical reconstruction of Spinoza with the help of AI analysis I reconstruct Spinoza logically and historically, extract the structural weaknesses of his system, and we engage in a “Pursoman” dialogue among:
* Spinoza
* The School “I know no more than this”
* And an AI analytical interlocutor.

Please choose the path you prefer — or suggest a fourth one if you wish."