Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

==== - It gives a precise way to write down surface energy/current densities, to build a shell → stress-energy → Einstein curvature chain, and to evaluate whether QAT can produce GGG from geometry. ====
* It also highlights that using Planck time or Planck length directly while trying to derive GGG is circular unless QAT itself explains why those Planck scales arise (which would be a very significant achievement).

If you want I can now:
* do the explicit numeric exploration of (A) using a few concrete, non-circular choices of ν\nuν and δ\deltaδ (I’ll show the numbers and orders of magnitude), or
* start the cosmological aggregation calculation (B) to see if the universe-scale QAT power budget could reproduce GGG.

Which would you like me to do next?