Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

==== I suggest two complementary calculations you can pick between (or I can do both sequentially): ====

(A) Non-circular local model (best immediate test):
* Pick a QAT hypothesis for ν\nuν and δ\deltaδ that does not presuppose GGG. For example, pick ν\nuν based on atomic physics timescales (Bohr orbital frequency, transition rates, etc.) and pick δ\deltaδ as a small fraction of r0r_0r0 (or as a QAT-derived fraction related to α or ϕ).
* Use the formula G≃4πc3 δ r0ℏ νG \simeq \frac{4\pi c^3 \, \delta \, r_0}{\hbar\,\nu}G≃ℏν4πc3δr0 to compute the implied GGG. See whether you get a number in the right ballpark. This is concrete, non-circular and will show whether local QAT microphysics could plausibly set GGG.

(B) Cosmological aggregation (Dirac/Mach route):
* Compute a cosmic QAT energy density uQAT(t)u_{\rm QAT}(t)uQAT(t) by integrating per-atom event power across number density of matter and radiation, include cosmic expansion if needed.
* Insert uQATu_{\rm QAT}uQAT into the Friedmann equation or Einstein scaling and solve for how GGG would have to behave to match cosmology. This could produce scalings like Dirac’s G∝1/tG\propto 1/tG∝1/t or MU∝t2M_U\propto t^2MU∝t2 depending on assumptions.

(C) Formalize CPT/spin connection:
* Write down the stress–energy tensor for the shell + EM system, show explicitly how photon exchange leads to a second-order stress term, and show the qualitative spin-2 character (this is more technical but doable).