Editing Openai/692bfc7e-4f6c-800e-b8ed-119c786e0138 (section)

=== User: I argue that experience and outcome are relative concepts, for many people if not the majority they're not separated yo… ===
I argue that experience and outcome are relative concepts, for many people if not the majority they're not separated you can guess your experience, ae know the outcome in advance. Statistically you can see the outcome or relative future of some people just by knowing where they're born, and some people they can know the outcome of their life the moment they're aware of their surrounding. You could say there is a difference between illusion and outcome, some people have hopes and dreams, it keep them alive and moving. For me I think I prefer we take a chance at Pluribus, you're stuck with current human condition, individuality, autonomy and agency, freedom. Isn't freedom and agency to move forward to something new and promising, isn't Pluribus an inexperienced experience, how do you think it's an outcome without experience. We failed as human to turn our current position to something better that we have now, and most experience are basity known outcomes, and most of that outcome is undignified suffering for many. If we really true to human nature of exploring we will inevitably try Pluribus. I don't know if it's bad or good, the premise is good for me. But if we believe conscious and concept of individuality, creativity, autonomy which is exist in relation to society come to existence in society. I think we might create new meanings in the Pluribus, it might even be against what we value know, but we didn't try it to know if we like it. For me just the premise of equal dignity is great anything extra is good. As I think first humans feared society, and we know people outside society, their life is not as rich and full as in society.