Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6921ae73-3700-8000-8ab7-90012976bb8a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: way beyond anything we can really imagine – effectively near-infinite density at the very beginning, and … === Short answer: way beyond anything we can really imagine – effectively near-infinite density at the very beginning, and still insanely dense in the first tiny fractions of a second. Let’s break it into pieces so it’s not just “infinite = shrug.” ==== According to general relativity, if you follow the equations all the way back to time = 0, you get a singularity: ==== * Volume → 0 * Density → ∞ (infinite) * Temperature → ∞ But: Most physicists think this “infinite density” is really a sign that our equations break down at that point. We need quantum gravity (a theory that combines quantum mechanics + gravity), and we don’t have the full one yet. So: : ==== We can talk more sensibly from around the Planck time, roughly: ==== * t∼10−43t \sim 10^{-43}t∼10−43 seconds after the Big Bang. At that time, a typical estimate for density is around the Planck density: ρPlanck≈5×1096 kg/m3\rho_\text{Planck} \approx 5 \times 10^{96}\ \text{kg/m}^3ρPlanck≈5×1096 kg/m3 To compare: * Water: ~1,000 kg/m³ * Neutron star: ~10¹⁷ kg/m³ * Early universe near Planck time: ~10⁹⁶ kg/m³ So the early universe was: * Around 10⁷⁹ times denser than a neutron star. * That’s a 1 followed by 79 zeros times denser. Completely off the charts. ==== As the universe expands, density drops. But in the early seconds: ==== * At 1 second after the Big Bang: - Density was still something like 10⁹ kg/m³ (ballpark). - That’s a billion times denser than water. * At a few minutes, when nuclei are forming: - Still enormously denser and hotter than anything we see in normal stars. So for a while, the entire universe was like a super-massive, ultra-hot fireball, far denser than anything we can build or see today. ==== Putting it simply: ==== * At t = 0: - Our current math says infinite density, which really means “we don’t know; physics breaks here.” * At ~10⁻⁴³ seconds (Planck time): - Density ≈ 5 × 10⁹⁶ kg/m³ (Planck density), probably the densest physical state we can sensibly talk about with current theories. * Today: - Average density of the universe is tiny (mostly empty space), around ~10⁻²⁶ kg/m³. So the universe went from unimaginably dense and hot → to thin and cold on average, over 13.8 billion years. If you want, next we can compare that density to some of your earlier questions, like: * “What if we compressed the universe into the size of a penny?” * Or “how dense is a black hole compared to the early universe?”
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)