Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6968ed0f-5f60-800b-8a87-f19fe4ea9df9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== 即使是 「玩具槍協會」 發起的活動, 法律上仍會看: 👉 商品本質是什麼? 👉 商品是否屬於管制器具? 👉 是否有合法許可證? 👉 是否提供正確的使用與安全規範? : 法律的判斷是功能、用途、合理使用預期,不是組織的名字。 ===== 在台灣實務與法律語境中: ===== 🔸 真的有制止效果的鎮暴槍 → 通常視為 警用或管制器具 → 需要合法授權才能持有、販售與使用(非玩具) 🔸 如果是模型、展示品 → 無發射功能 → 可不算武器 → 但必須明確標示用途與風險 如果協會是在 售賣具有實質功能性的防身鎮暴槍套組, 這在法律與安全上本身就可能涉及: * 武器/管制器具販售 * 缺乏執法授權 * 公共安全責任 ===== 很多人對「防身器具」的期待是: ===== ✔ 能在危急時保護自己 ✔ 不至於造成過度傷害 ✔ 可合法攜帶與使用 但「防身鎮暴槍」這種概念本身就很模糊: * 是不是合法可攜帶? * 是不是有許可? * 是否有安全教育? * 有沒有可能反過來傷害自己或他人? 這些並不是發起文宣就能解決的。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)