Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/694c32ff-4db8-8006-a42d-34dfb80b14ea
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 3. How this lines up with statutory tax brackets ==== You asked about βtax brackets,β so two key pieces: # Top marginal tax rates fell a lot while top incomes took off - Combined top marginal personal rate (federal + Ontario example) fell from about 80% in 1970 to ~51% by the late 1980s, via reforms in 1972, 1982 and 1987. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> - Corporate tax rates dropped from ~52% in 1982 to around 26β27% by 2022. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> - That period coincides with the explosion of top-end incomes and corporate profits documented in the DINA work. WID - World Inequality Database<ref>{{cite web|title=WID - World Inequality Database|url=https://prod.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2023/12/WorldInequalityLab_WP2023_27_Income-inequality-in-Canada_Final-1.pdf|publisher=WID - World Inequality Database|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> # Effective total tax rate has become less progressive Canadians for Tax Fairness estimate total tax paid as a share of income (income, payroll, sales, property, etc.): taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> - 1988: - Median earner and top 1% both paid ~35% of income in total taxes. - 2022: - Median earner: pays about 43% of income in total taxes. - Top 1%: pays only 23.6% of income in total taxes. So despite higher statutory rates on high brackets, the overall system (once you include GST, corporate taxes, capital gains rules, etc.) is now effectively more regressive than it was in the late 1980s.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)