Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6920370e-af50-8007-985e-1645172973a6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 方向 3:公民監督與立委責任制強化 ===== 主張:公民可直接發起「立委問責公投」或「重大法案解除連任禁制」,讓持續闖關、破壞程序的立委面臨淘汰。 為什麼能反制:藍白的「人數優勢表決」反覆出現,若能直接從選票/公投端對立委責任加壓,能倒逼政黨與立委更慎重。中華職業網<ref>{{cite web|title=中華職業網|url=https://ccw.org.tw/news/20250716-press-release|publisher=ccw.org.tw|access-date=2025-11-22}}</ref> 可能的主文範例:「你是否同意:當某一立法委員連續三次(或三年內)參與或支持通過改動憲政機制/監察司法制衡之法案,且未經全民公聽會或問責程序,則得由該選區選民發起解除該立委資格之公投?」 補充條件:要設連署門檻、問責標準(如:是否定義「破壞憲政制衡」行為)、以及避免被濫用為純政治鬥爭工具。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)