Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6945f9bd-f198-8008-bb8c-1ab730279e5f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: GPUs can exploit an nDspace model precisely because nDspace makes explicit what GPUs require but most software hides: i… === GPUs can exploit an nDspace model precisely because nDspace makes explicit what GPUs require but most software hides: independence, nullity, projection, and invariance. The mismatch you observed in NodeBox disappears once nDspace is treated as the primary abstraction rather than an emergent side-effect. I will answer this in a structured, architectural way. ==== A GPU does not think in sequences. It thinks in: ==== * Independent dimensions * Massive parallel states * Stateless projection kernels * Sparse relevance This aligns naturally with nDspace if dimensions are explicit. What GPUs struggle with is: * Hidden conditionals * Implicit dependencies * Sequential recomputation Exactly the weaknesses of NodeBox-style graphs without an anchor. ==== : ==== GPUs excel at selection across dimensions; CPUs excel at branching logic. Once this shift is made, the mapping becomes clear. ==== In an nDspace model: ==== * Each dimension corresponds to an independent axis of variation * Each point in nDspace is a complete system state * Each projection is a collapse into observable form On a GPU: * Thread indices already form an implicit nD grid * Kernel parameters naturally represent dimensions * Tensor layouts already encode high-dimensional structure ===== | | | ===== | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GPUs do not need to be taught nDspace. They need it to be declared. ==== In NodeBox: ==== * Inactive sub-networks still cost traversal time In nDspace: * Null dimensions are explicitly marked * GPU kernels skip them entirely * No scheduling, no branching, no memory access This is the single biggest performance gain. Null is not zero. Null is non-existence. GPUs thrive on sparse execution when sparsity is declared. ==== Without nDspace: ==== * Every animation frame recomputes geometry With nDspace: * Geometry exists in higher-dimensional state * Time is a dimension * Frames are projections, not recomputations ===== 1. Persistent nD State (CPU or GPU memory) ===== # Fast projection kernels (GPU) # Minimal parameter updates (time axis) This is exactly how modern graphics pipelines work—NodeBox just never made the split explicit. ==== Once sub-networks are recognized as subspaces: ==== * Each subspace can be compiled into a specialized GPU kernel * Conditional invocation becomes kernel selection * Nested logic disappears from runtime execution This eliminates: * Branch divergence * Instruction stalls * Unpredictable execution paths GPUs hate branching. nDspace removes it by design. ==== Kolam generation illustrates this cleanly. ==== Kolam constraints include: * Symmetry axes * Local crossing rules * Periodicity * Boundary conditions In nDspace: * Each rule is a dimension * Valid kolams occupy a constrained subspace * Rendering is projection onto 2D On GPU: * Each thread evaluates one local configuration * Symmetry dimensions are broadcast * Invalid points lie in null space and are skipped What takes minutes procedurally becomes milliseconds as projection. ==== NodeBox lacked: ==== * Declared dimensions * Persistent higher-dimensional state * Explicit null space * Separation of generation and projection Therefore: * Everything looked sequential * Everything had to be recomputed * GPUs saw chaos, not structure This is why cloning NodeBox for GPU use stalled. ==== Conceptually: ==== # Declare Dimensions - Applicability - Time - Symmetry - Constraints # Define Subspaces - Which dimensions are active together # Store State - High-dimensional buffers/tensors # Project - GPU kernels collapse nD → 3D/2D # Observe - Rendering, animation, analysis This mirrors: * Physics engines * ML inference * Modern rendering pipelines ==== GPUs are not accelerators for procedures. ==== They are accelerators for spaces. NodeBox expressed procedures. Your nDspace expresses space. That is why GPUs could not “see” NodeBox—but would immediately thrive in an nDspace-grounded system. ==== : ==== NodeBox reached for this intuition but lacked the foundation. nDspace supplies it. Once the foundation exists, GPU acceleration stops being an optimization and becomes the natural mode of execution.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)