Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68543586-b3fc-8004-86a9-b3760b4894b0
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes, absolutely—you’re right to focus on this. === Yes, absolutely—you’re right to focus on this. If the trustee concludes that Clickerr is essentially the same enterprise as Cliqly—a so-called “successor” business—they ''can'' pursue what's known as successor liability, potentially holding Clickerr responsible for unpaid Cliqly debts, including affiliate commissions. ===== Successor liability is a legal doctrine that can hold a new or rebranded company responsible for the debts of its predecessor, even in an asset sale or after a reorganization Aronsohn Weiner Salerno<ref>{{cite web|title=Aronsohn Weiner Salerno|url=https://www.aronsohnweinersalerno.com/blogs/2020-01-08-successor-liability-same-old-or-not|publisher=Aronsohn Weiner Salerno|access-date=2025-12-06}}</ref>. ===== Courts generally won't apply it unless certain conditions are met—like when: # The new company continues doing the same business under the same identity. # Shares, leadership, systems, or customer bases transfer over. # The transition resembles a "continuation" or is perceived as a "phoenix" company rising from the ashes of the old Aronsohn Weiner Salerno<ref>{{cite web|title=Aronsohn Weiner Salerno|url=https://www.aronsohnweinersalerno.com/blogs/2020-01-08-successor-liability-same-old-or-not|publisher=Aronsohn Weiner Salerno|access-date=2025-12-06}}</ref>. ===== Under bankruptcy law, asset sales are usually “free and clear” of debtor liabilities (per Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code). But, there are exceptions. ===== * Courts have recognized that '''successor liability claims themselves are part of the bankruptcy estate'''—meaning the trustee could pursue those claims on behalf of creditors Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/perspectives/advisories/2024/10/bankruptcy-court-holds-third-party-successor|publisher=arnoldporter.com|access-date=2025-12-06}}</ref>. * That means the '''trustee'''—not individual creditors—would bring such a claim, potentially forcing Clickerr to pay these debts. ===== Based on everything you’ve compiled: ===== * '''Same people''': Bobby Jones and David Beeson lead both. * '''Same systems & assets''': MyInboxPro, Conversion House Media, commissions dashboard, training—identical across platforms. * '''Same messaging''': Sales pages, launch calls, “sister company” language. * '''Sequential company structure''': DE Marketing LLC (records show assumed name “Cliqly,” then asset sale leading to Clickerr Marketing LLC and Push Platform LLC branching). All of these point to '''continuity of identity and operations''', a key factor courts use in successor liability cases American Bar Association<ref>{{cite web|title=American Bar Association|url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/labor_law/resources/committee-articles/archive/successor-liability-theory-can-be-applied-withdrawal-liability-claims/|publisher=American Bar Association|access-date=2025-12-06}}</ref>. ===== If subpoenas or an asset-purchase hearing goes ahead, the trustee may ask: ===== * Was Clickerr legally a planned successor to Cliqly? * Were assets, infrastructure, or accounts transferred from Cliqly to Clickerr? * Did Cliqly’s leadership, employees, or locations carry over? * Were Cliqly unpaid commissions or account balances discharged or transferred to Clickerr? Positive answers may give the trustee grounds to pursue a successor liability claim against Clickerr. ===== 1. Trustee pursues successor liability and courts hold Clickerr responsible for some or all Cliqly debts. ===== # Trustee negotiates a settlement or fund (a “channeling injunction”) to pay Cliqly affiliates from Clickerr’s revenue or assets. # Trustee makes a claim but a court dismisses it, finding Clickerr was a valid asset purchase. # Trustee decides against pursuing due to insufficient linkage. ===== Given the evidence of shared people, systems, and operations—and the rebranding strategy—it’s entirely plausible for a trustee to separate successor liability against Clickerr. Well-documented proof (screenshots, system mappings, sales pages, legal entity trails) strengthens that possibility. ===== If you’d like, I can help craft a structured exhibit bundle for the trustee outlining the continuity and tying evidence to each legal factor.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)