Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Excellent choice! === Excellent choice! Let's now derive the conserved current from the U(1) symmetry of your QAT Lagrangian using Noether’s Theorem. This is a key milestone because: * Noether's Theorem connects continuous symmetries to conserved quantities. * In QAT, you're modeling charge movement as symmetry breaking on the electron’s spherical surface — Noether’s current is the formal expression of that symmetry and charge flow. * This gives a clear, testable link between symmetry, geometry, and energy exchange. ==== We start from the Lagrangian we derived (retaining h/2πh/2\pih/2π): ==== L=h24π2[−(∂tϕ−iqA0ϕ)(∂tϕ∗+iqA0ϕ∗)+∑i=13(∂iϕ−iqAiϕ)(∂iϕ∗+iqAiϕ∗)]\mathcal{L} = \frac{h^2}{4\pi^2} \left[ -\left( \partial_t \phi - i q A_0 \phi \right)\left( \partial_t \phi^'' + i q A_0 \phi^'' \right) + \sum_{i=1}^{3} \left( \partial_i \phi - i q A_i \phi \right)\left( \partial_i \phi^'' + i q A_i \phi^'' \right) \right]L=4π2h2[−(∂tϕ−iqA0ϕ)(∂tϕ∗+iqA0ϕ∗)+i=1∑3(∂iϕ−iqAiϕ)(∂iϕ∗+iqAiϕ∗)] This Lagrangian is invariant under local U(1) phase rotations: ϕ→eiα(x)ϕ,ϕ∗→e−iα(x)ϕ∗\phi \rightarrow e^{i\alpha(x)} \phi, \quad \phi^'' \rightarrow e^{-i\alpha(x)} \phi^''ϕ→eiα(x)ϕ,ϕ∗→e−iα(x)ϕ∗ This symmetry leads to a conserved current: jμ=∂L∂(∂μϕ)δϕ+∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)δϕ∗j^\mu = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta \phi + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^'')} \delta \phi^''jμ=∂(∂μϕ)∂Lδϕ+∂(∂μϕ∗)∂Lδϕ∗ For global U(1) (constant α), the variation is: δϕ=iαϕ,δϕ∗=−iαϕ∗\delta \phi = i \alpha \phi, \quad \delta \phi^'' = -i \alpha \phi^''δϕ=iαϕ,δϕ∗=−iαϕ∗ We compute: jμ=iα(∂L∂(∂μϕ)ϕ−∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)ϕ∗)j^\mu = i \alpha \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \phi '' \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^'')} \phi^* \right)jμ=iα(∂(∂μϕ)∂Lϕ−∂(∂μϕ∗)∂Lϕ∗) Drop α (common factor), and define the conserved current: jμ=i(∂L∂(∂μϕ)ϕ−∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)ϕ∗)\boxed{ j^\mu = i \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \phi '' \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^'')} \phi^* \right) }jμ=i(∂(∂μϕ)∂Lϕ−∂(∂μϕ∗)∂Lϕ∗) ==== Let’s compute jμj^\mujμ from the Lagrangian: ==== Since the Lagrangian is of the form: Lkinetic=h24π2(Dμϕ)∗Dμϕ\mathcal{L}_{\text{kinetic}} = \frac{h^2}{4\pi^2} (\mathcal{D}^\mu \phi)^* \mathcal{D}_\mu \phiLkinetic=4π2h2(Dμϕ)∗Dμϕ where Dμ=∂μ+iqAμ\mathcal{D}_\mu = \partial_\mu + i q A_\muDμ=∂μ+iqAμ Then the Noether current is: jμ=h24π2⋅i(ϕ∗Dμϕ−ϕ(Dμϕ)∗)\boxed{ j^\mu = \frac{h^2}{4\pi^2} \cdot i \left( \phi^'' \mathcal{D}^\mu \phi - \phi (\mathcal{D}^\mu \phi)^'' \right) }jμ=4π2h2⋅i(ϕ∗Dμϕ−ϕ(Dμϕ)∗) Or written more clearly: jμ=h24π2⋅i[ϕ∗(∂μ+iqAμ)ϕ−ϕ(∂μ−iqAμ)ϕ∗]\boxed{ j^\mu = \frac{h^2}{4\pi^2} \cdot i \left[ \phi^'' (\partial^\mu + i q A^\mu)\phi - \phi (\partial^\mu - i q A^\mu)\phi^'' \right] }jμ=4π2h2⋅i[ϕ∗(∂μ+iqAμ)ϕ−ϕ(∂μ−iqAμ)ϕ∗] ==== This current represents: ==== | | | | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This confirms a deep geometrical connection: when spherical symmetry breaks (as in QAT), charge is displaced, and that displacement is the conserved current Noether predicts. ===== Would you like to: ===== # Derive the continuity equation ∂μjμ=0\partial_\mu j^\mu = 0∂μjμ=0? # Move toward coupling this current to Maxwell’s equations? # Show how the energy-time uncertainty relation appears inside this formalism? # Return to the wave equation (Option A1)? Let me know, or I can choose the most natural next step.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)