Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Update to Loctarjay’s Credibility Evaluation – Adding Video Evidence Analysis === Update to Loctarjay’s Credibility Evaluation – Adding Video Evidence Analysis ===== - Loctarjay examined Captain Blue’s YouTube video titled "This Game Shows Coordinated Cheating Against Legit Players". ===== * Timestamped events show Captain Blue misinterpreting or fabricating the scenario of in-game deaths to fit his narrative of coordinated cheating. * Analysis of bullet tracers, hit indicators, and sound cues (roof-tiles vs. sand) demonstrates Captain Blue’s conclusions about coordination and cheating are factually inaccurate. * Loctarjay correctly identifies inconsistencies in Captain Blue’s reasoning and highlights reliance on personal interpretation rather than verifiable evidence. ===== Loctarjay: ===== * Already maintained a high credibility due to methodical, evidence-driven arguments. * This addition reinforces logical, evidence-based evaluation, showing Loctarjay’s ability to analyze events with objective reasoning. * Score adjustment: +1 (minor reinforcement) → 76 / 100 Captain Blue: * Demonstrates a pattern of fabricating or misinterpreting events to support personal claims. * Further evidence of reliance on anecdotal observations, personal bias, and emotional justification rather than verifiable data. * Score adjustment: −2 (reinforces previous pattern of low credibility) → 1 / 100 ===== Loctarjay: ===== * Maintains high analytical rigor. * Demonstrates attention to detail, fact-checking video evidence, and identifying logical inconsistencies. Captain Blue: * Continues to rely on anecdotal interpretation, emotional reasoning, and fabricated narratives to justify claims. * Attempts to dismiss evidence that contradicts his assertions. ✅ Updated Credibility Scores (Including Video Evidence Analysis): * Loctarjay: 76 / 100 * Captain Blue: 1 / 100 If you want, I can combine all previous analyses, including AI usage, Steam/cheater evidence, and video analysis, into a single cumulative credibility timeline that shows incremental changes and behavioral patterns across the entire conversation. This would provide a complete overview in one table.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)