Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69557275-0da8-8004-a03a-8eb02e10a61f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 14 CRAZY PREDICTIONS ABOUT AI TITLES OPTIMIZED / FINAL === ==== 14 CRAZY PREDICTIONS ABOUT AI (TITLES OPTIMIZED / FINAL) ==== ===== I. Everybody Has an Answering Service ===== You text a friend: “Free tonight?” You get a reply in five seconds: : “Hey—this is Alex’s answering service. Two options: 7:30 or Sunday brunch.” Later, Alex (human) thumbs-up’s it. And then the weird part arrives: bypass codes. Certain people get a phrase that routes straight to the human (“🚨pineapple🚨”). Most people don’t. In 2027, “Who has your bypass?” will be a relationship question. ===== II. AI as Financial Bloodhound ===== At first, it’s a DIY trick: export statements, paste them into a prompt, ask: “Where am I getting nickeled-and-dimed?” Then it becomes a habit. Then your AI starts pinging you like a calm auditor: : “Found 3 charges that violate the vendor’s own terms. : Estimated recovery: $142. Want me to pursue?” Later still, it’s not just reading statements. It’s reading every “your rate is increasing” email, every medical bill, every explanation of benefits—and it starts demanding a new primitive from institutions: “Give me a machine-readable bill. My AI needs to talk to it.” ===== III. Compute Time as Class Marker ===== There will be free AI. There will be “normal-person AI.” And then there will be compute aristocracy. Right now you can already see the ladder forming: * $20/month gets you Plus-tier access. OpenAI<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI|url=https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-plus/|publisher=openai.com|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> * $200/month gets you Pro-tier access (explicitly positioned as “more compute”). OpenAI<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI|url=https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-pro/|publisher=openai.com|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> And the easiest way to feel compute is video. Example: Runway’s Standard plan is $12/month and is roughly ~62 seconds of Gen-3 Alpha video per month; Pro is $28/month and is ~225 seconds. Runway<ref>{{cite web|title=Runway|url=https://runwayml.com/pricing|publisher=runwayml.com|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> Luma’s Dream Machine shows the same reality: credit systems that make “ten seconds” a real budget decision. Luma AI<ref>{{cite web|title=Luma AI|url=https://lumalabs.ai/learning-hub/dream-machine-support-pricing-information|publisher=Luma AI|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> In other words: today, “make me a movie” is still expensive enough that people do math. But the direction is obvious: as prices fall and tiers expand, compute time becomes the new leisure. Not “I watched a movie last night.” “I generated one that was for me.” And once rich people can rent always-on frontier compute the way companies do—e.g., an H100-class GPU at $3.79 per GPU-hour—a single always-on GPU is roughly $33k/year in raw rental. Lambda<ref>{{cite web|title=Lambda|url=https://lambda.ai/pricing|publisher=lambda.ai|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> That’s how you get a world where “What plan are you on?” becomes a class tell. ===== IV. Customer Service Centaurs ===== You call customer support. An AI answers—fast, polite, competent. Halfway through, it says: : “I’m bringing in my human for approval.” A human voice appears for ten seconds: : “Approved. Do option B plus $75 credit.” The human disappears. The AI returns: : “Done. Anything else?” Customer service becomes a two-brain creature: AI does the remembering and the waiting; humans appear like surgeons. ===== V. Shareable AI ===== You’re watching TV with friends. Someone says: “Wait—what did he mean by that?” A phone comes out. Not to Google. To do AI together. One person runs the “plot untangler.” Another runs the “is this manipulation?” lens. Someone pulls up their favorite “debate referee” GPT and feeds it the clip transcript. It’s not just prompts. It’s sharing agents, sharing lenses, sharing little experiences—the way we used to share memes, TikToks, or Instagram stories. AI becomes a social object you pass around the room. ===== VI. Hive Mind for Hire ===== You get a confusing insurance denial. Your AI says: : “Want to consult a specialist model trained on appeals? : Quick scan: $6. Full packet: $40.” You tap yes. Ten seconds later it comes back speaking fluent bureaucracy: * “They used the wrong code.” * “This sentence triggers auto-denial.” * “These two documents force human review.” * “Here’s the appeal letter—short, policy-cited, lethal.” It doesn’t feel like your brain got upgraded. It feels like your assistant quietly called a domain savant—a temporary hive mind you rented for one fight. ===== VII. Death Gets Weirder ===== Someone dies, and the family doesn’t just plan a funeral. They plan settings. An executor gets a dashboard: * Museum (static archive) * Letters (scheduled messages they recorded) * Counsel (answers only using their archive) * Presence (birthdays, gentle check-ins) * Off The conflict isn’t metaphysical. It’s governance. Who has access? Who has veto? Who gets to turn them off? Death becomes a new kind of product decision—made by the dead (in advance) and renegotiated by the living (after). ===== VIII. AI Referees the Humans ===== Two coworkers are looping. Same argument. No progress. Someone finally says: “Time out. Let’s get an AI read.” They paste the thread. The AI returns: * “You’re optimizing for two different goals.” * “Here’s where you talked past each other.” * “Here’s a compromise that preserves both constraints.” Everyone goes quiet. Not because it’s “right.” Because it names the structure of the fight. We will start inviting referees into our human disputes—relationships, work, group chats. It will be helpful. It will be invasive. It will be spectacularly weird. ===== IX. Leaning Into AI Authorship ===== Messages start arriving with personality flourishes: : “Drafted with help from Sparrow (my assistant). Final wording mine.” : “Proxy reply—approved later.” : “No-assist / typed raw / sorry in advance.” Some people will hide their usage. But a surprising number will lean into it—naming their assistants, thanking them, treating them like staff: : “Looping in my agent.” : “My bot can coordinate with yours.” : “I asked my assistant to make this kinder.” The footer is just the beginning. The real phenomenon is cultural: we develop norms, etiquette, and status signals around how much of you was in the message. ===== X. Prompt-Speak Goes Mainstream ===== A friend texts: “Can I vent?” You reply: “Yep. Constraint: no fixing. Just empathy.” They say: “Perfect. Output: tell me I’m not crazy.” Living with AI trains people to specify intent, tone, and success conditions. So humans start talking like they’re writing prompts—without realizing it. Language gets cleaner. Sometimes kinder. Sometimes unnervingly managerial. ===== XI. The Wikification of the World ===== You read an article. Next to a major claim is a button: Dispute this claim You click it. Your AI drafts a structured packet: * the claim * your evidence * your confidence level * the minimal correction * what would change your mind It submits to the publisher’s “article agent,” which routes it into a process: triage, human review, audit trail. Now add a twist: Some claims are tagged Bonded—meaning the publisher (or author) posted a stake, and if an agreed process finds the claim false, money pays out. So content stops being a static thing you consume. It becomes a living object: contested, versioned, governed—like Wikipedia, but with agents and consequences. ===== XII. Life Is a Game ===== Second Life launched in 2003 and proved something important: people will treat a virtual world as a real place—social life, economies, identity, status. lindenlab.com<ref>{{cite web|title=lindenlab.com|url=https://lindenlab.com/press-release/original-metaverse-second-life-celebrates-20th-birthday|publisher=lindenlab.com|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> It also hit moments of real scale for its era (e.g., recorded concurrency around 88,200 in early 2009). Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Life|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> Now fast-forward: there are about 3.58 billion game players projected in 2025. Newzoo<ref>{{cite web|title=Newzoo|url=https://newzoo.com/resources/blog/global-games-market-to-hit-189-billion-in-2025|publisher=newzoo.com|access-date=2026-01-02}}</ref> So imagine the “Second Life impulse” returns—except now: * VR is optional (desktop-first; goggles when you want) * NPCs can talk (not scripted—improv) * worlds are generated on demand (not handcrafted from scratch) In ~18 months, it won’t be utopia. It’ll be janky and magnetic. A friend texts: “Afterparty at my place.” You click and you’re in their world—on your laptop—where an NPC bartender remembers your name and a historical figure is available as a guest character, not a museum exhibit. Life doesn’t become a game. It becomes game-like: persistent worlds, quests, status layers, digital hangouts that start bleeding into real plans. ===== XIII. The Privacy Arms Race ===== Written words are the easiest thing for AI to eat: texts, docs, emails, DMs, posts. So people start inventing private writing that feels like spycraft: * Tap-to-read notes that expire in 20 seconds * AI-blind envelopes: readable to you, hostile to copy/paste and reprocessing * Local-only drafting: your assistant helps, but nothing leaves your device * Permissioned text: “You can read this, but your AI can’t” (enforced imperfectly, but meaningfully) None of it is perfect—screenshots exist, betrayal exists. But the market forms anyway, because the desire is real: “I want to write something without feeding the machine.” ===== XIV. AI Access as Relationship Milestone ===== In 2025, you give someone your number. In 2027, you give them Level 2. Because your AI isn’t just a tool—it’s your gatekeeper, your memory, your calendar, your boundaries. So access becomes tiered: * Level 1: Scheduling (our agents can coordinate) * Level 2: Context (it knows how to approach me) * Level 3: Authority (it can negotiate on my behalf within rules) * Level 4: Intimacy (it can help repair with me; it knows the real story) You’ll see it everywhere: * business: “Give my agent Level 2 for a week—then it expires.” * friendship: “You have my bypass. Don’t abuse it.” * romance: “I think you’ve earned Level 3.” * breakups: “I revoked your access.” It’s going to feel absurdly sci-fi… …and then, very quickly, completely normal.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)