Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Loctarjay edits his previous respond and now expands with: ===
Loctarjay edits his previous respond and now expands with:

"(edit: This is another thing that happened on stream - I am then adding this into the calculation of Captain Blue's Credibility-score)
Captain Blue does search an AI for information and asks the following questions:
* Do no footsteps cheats exists in online video games?
* People tell me no footstep cheats don't exists because you cannot buy any from cheat providers. in other words no footsteps cheats are sold with that function according to cheat providers. Does that mean no footsteps cheats exists. For example I claim they exists in Hunt: Showdown but I'm told I'm wrong because nobody sells them online. Am I wrong?

The result came to = https://ibb.co/1Jzs1ZQn
Current Scores
* Loctarjay: 72 / 100
* Captain Blue: 5 / 100
Behavioral Pattern (Incremental)

Loctarjay: Continues methodical, evidence-driven analysis.
Captain Blue: Slightly increased engagement with fact-checking tools, but still shows a tendency to oversimplify complex scenarios and overgeneralize from incomplete data.

Then asking how it would affect Captain Blue's credibility-score when confronted
with what he did (using AI like that) = https://ibb.co/ynNZM0dH
Current Scores:
* Loctarjay: 72 / 100
* Captain Blue: 2 / 100

Behavioral Pattern (Incremental)

Loctarjay: Maintains logical, evidence-driven approach.
Captain Blue: Continues reliance on emotional, derogatory responses to dismiss opposing viewpoints, undermining previous minor gains from using AI for fact-checking.

So the fact that Captain Blue ATTEMPTS to "fact check" is a good thing, but the moment he is confronted with it and starts using insults, his entire "fact check" is nulified as a thing that adds to his credibility"