Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/67d15f5b-c450-800b-a548-b5b9d1d5c917
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes! === Yes! I think what you've done already succeeds in creating a powerful scaffold for students β a clear, visible progression of how language can become more accurate and sophisticated step by step. That's no small achievement, and the fact that it aligns partially but not fully with Pearsonβs GSE scores gives us valuable feedback about what can be improved or clarified in the process. You're absolutely right to think about refining the prompt β and I agree it doesn't necessarily need to be much longer. It's more about where the emphasis is placed and how the stages are framed to maximize the chance of real progression in both complexity and functionality (which seems to be what Pearson measures to shift levels). ===== π‘ Reflections on what has worked so far ===== # β Clear error identification and correction - These first steps definitely align well with what Pearson looks for (accuracy, basic control). # β Gradual improvements - The move to more cohesive and slightly more sophisticated language is effective up to B1+. # β Useful models for students - Each step is a clearer, richer version of what they produced, showing the "ladder" concept. ===== π© What might be limiting "full" progression (e.g., to B2) ===== From what we've seen: * Focus remains on improving form/structure over function and purpose. (More beautiful sentences, but still "retelling" in the same way.) * Lack of discourse features and more complex "moves" like evaluation, comparison, speculation, or generalization β which are likely essential to break into B2. * Even at higher steps, still a "story" at B1 level, rather than a more "intellectual" or "discussive" take on the story. ===== β Possible adjustments to the prompt (without getting longer) ===== Here are small but impactful refinements that could fit your existing character space, focusing especially on steps 6-9 (the higher-level versions): ====== βοΈ Current instruction idea for improvements: ====== : "Write an improved transcript one level up on the abovementioned CEFR scale, marking as above" ====== π‘ Possible refined version, same length (or shorter!): ====== : "Rewrite the transcript one level up, using more complex sentences, richer vocabulary, and more advanced functions (e.g., opinions, comparisons, speculation), marking changes as above." β‘οΈ This small shift adds functional aims (opinions, comparisons, speculation), signaling to focus not only on sentence form but on depth of communication β which may help hit B2 more reliably. ===== β Alternative way β specific instruction per step (also fits within length): ===== You could rephrase each of steps 4, 6, 8 to emphasize specific growth goals: * Step 4 (same level improvement): "Write an improved version at the same level, adding more natural phrasing and connected sentences, marking changes as above." * Step 6 (one level up): "Rewrite one level up, adding richer vocabulary and more complex sentence structures, and expressing opinions where possible, marking changes as above." * Step 8 (two levels up): "Rewrite two levels up, adding advanced structures, abstract vocabulary, and new functions like speculation, comparison, and evaluation, marking changes as above." β‘οΈ This gradually builds expectations, giving clearer targets for what "one level up" and "two levels up" mean. ===== π Summary of possible refinements ===== | Current Step | Suggested Refinement (same length or shorter) | | ------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Step 4 | "Write an improved version at the same level, adding more natural phrasing and connected sentences, marking changes as above." | | Step 6 | "Rewrite one level up, adding richer vocabulary, more complex sentences, and opinions where possible, marking changes as above." | | Step 8 | "Rewrite two levels up, adding advanced structures, abstract vocabulary, and new functions like speculation, comparison, and evaluation, marking changes as above." | ===== β Benefits ===== * Keeps your "ladder" structure. * Adds functional as well as formal language goals. * Pushes higher steps into functional B2 territory. * Still concise β likely within character constraints. ===== π Takeaway ===== I think your core idea is very strong β and these tweaks could take it from "partially achieved" to fully effective, especially if you want clear, level-linked models for students. Want me to draft a "full revised version" of your prompt including these changes, all in one place? Or would you prefer to experiment with wording yourself and I can give feedback?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)