Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/696e1d5c-5fcc-800f-8830-fd3417f7869d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 🧠 結論 ===== 記事の構成としては、 ➡︎ 「立憲が安保法制を合憲とする立場に転換した」と書きながら、実際の発言ではその核心部分について明確な立場表明を避けている という矛盾が生じています。 このため読者が「立憲は安保法制を積極的に合憲と判断した」と理解するか、「まだ曖昧である」と理解するかで解釈が分かれてしまい、文章全体の整合性が損なわれています。 TNCニュース<ref>{{cite web|title=TNCニュース|url=https://news.tnc.ne.jp/politics/867653_1.html|publisher=news.tnc.ne.jp|access-date=2026-01-20}}</ref> 必要なら、「合憲判断」と「集団的自衛権の評価」の違い/立憲の従来の立場から今回の変化の意味についても整理して解説します。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)