Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6788fad3-d7fc-800d-9728-95eaac44f689
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Keshe's View: ===== * Matter is formed from interactions of "plasmatic magnetic fields" (PMTICS). Magnetic fields are the "new elementary particles." * Plasma is a composite of matter, antimatter, and dark matter, whose interactions form observable matter. * The universe operates on a nested hierarchy, where atomic structures mirror planetary and cosmic scales. Keely's View: * Matter arises from etheric subdivisions, progressing from the tenuous to the gross (spiritual to physical). * The structure of matter is governed by vibratory laws, where three primary forces (syntropy, entropy, equilibrium) harmonize to create stable matter. * Keely identified the "neutral center" as the core of all matter, controlling its organization and binding forces. Comparison: * Similarities: - Both models reject mainstream particle physics (e.g., quarks, gluons) and instead rely on a vibratory, field-based model. - The neutral center in Keely’s theory resonates with Keshe’s "core magnetic interactions" that govern the dynamics of matter at all scales. - Both emphasize a dynamic continuum from subtle (etheric/magnetic fields) to dense physical matter. * Differences: - Keely’s system is vibratory, emphasizing harmonic oscillations, while Keshe's PMTICS describe magnetic flux interactions as the basis of formation. - Keely’s etheric subdivisions extend to spiritual realms, while Keshe frames his model in physical and cosmological terms.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)