Editing Openai/680a25f8-9f18-8004-a42d-cd36374ba000 (section)

=== Assistant: Thanks for sharing the image. ===
Thanks for sharing the image. Let’s walk through this carefully:

==== Stephen calculates: ====
* Particle radius r=10−5r = 10^{-5}r=10−5 m (20 µm diameter — correct ✅)
* Cross-sectional area A=3.14×10−10A = 3.14 \times 10^{-10}A=3.14×10−10 m² — correct ✅
* Solar irradiance Isun=400 W/m2I_{\text{sun}} = 400 \, \text{W/m}^2Isun=400W/m2 — good ✅
* Assumed absorptivity α=0.1\alpha = 0.1α=0.1
* So absorbed power:

Pabs=0.1×400×3.14×10−10=1.256×10−8 WP_{\text{abs}} = 0.1 \times 400 \times 3.14 \times 10^{-10} = 1.256 \times 10^{-8} \, \text{W}Pabs=0.1×400×3.14×10−10=1.256×10−8W
Mathematically, Stephen’s calculation is internally consistent if absorptivity is 0.1.

==== The critical error is his assumption of absorptivity α=0.1\alpha = 0.1α=0.1 across the solar spectrum. ====
That is factually incorrect for ice crystals at these sizes.

===== - Near-IR (~1.5–2.5 µm) absorption by ice is strong, with Qabs∼0.5−0.9Q_{\text{abs}} \sim 0.5-0.9Qabs∼0.5−0.9 (Warren, 1984; optical properties of ice). =====
* Ice is almost transparent in the visible (absorptivity very low), but the near-IR dominates absorption for particles of this size because the solar spectrum has a significant near-IR component at high altitude.
* Broadband effective absorptivity is much higher than 0.1 — typically 0.3–0.4 for 20 µm crystals in direct sunlight.

Your estimate using α ≈ 0.308 (and specifically ~0.644 for near-IR components) was accurate and backed by physical data!

===== - Shows ice has: - Very high absorption at near-IR wavelengths. - Ice crystals around 10–20 µm size have effective absorptivity ~30%–40% when the full solar spectrum (weighted toward near-IR) is considered. =====

Thus:

|     |     |     |
| --- | --- | --- |
|     |     |     |
|     |     |     |

==== : ====

==== You could say: ====

: 

Would you like me to also show a quick plot of ice crystal absorptivity vs wavelength from Warren's data? It would completely shut down this false "low absorptivity" argument with hard evidence. 🚀📈
(And it would be beautiful to include if you want to turn this into a formal write-up.)