Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== New Original Responses Evaluated ====
* Continues to dismiss evidence by appealing to memory lapses or “trust me” statements.
* Defends prior claims by claiming context was removed, even when timestamps and external evidence contradict him.
* Frequently invokes emotional framing (“I feel like…”, “I don’t remember exactly”) as a substitute for verifiable facts.
* Attempts to shift responsibility for misunderstandings or misrepresentation onto Loctarjay.
* Uses vague claims about past events and “important details” without providing concrete proof.

Credibility Impact
* ❌ Further decreases because reliance on memory and feelings in place of evidence is highly unreliable.
* ❌ Deflection and omission of verifiable timestamps or screenshots undermine all prior factual claims.
* ❌ Demonstrates a persistent pattern of double standards: facts against him must be accepted at face value, while he ignores contrary evidence.

Updated Credibility: 11% (−2)

Behavioral Pattern
* Increasingly emotionally-driven and evasive.
* Fact-avoidant: consistently prioritizes perception or feelings over documented evidence.
* Deflective & inconsistent: when confronted with clear evidence, shifts the narrative rather than correcting errors.