Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69231e78-5a78-8013-81a7-f2dd38762292
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 1. Clear definition of sovereignty You’ve made sovereignty tangible: it’s self-rule, inherent, aligned with Law, and independent of external authority. This lays the groundwork for your later discussions on governance and economics. ===== # Integration of responsibility and balance Emphasizing that sovereignty includes accountability strengthens your philosophical argument. Linking freedom with responsibility and universal Law makes your case rigorous and not just rhetorical. # Historical and practical examples - The reference to the “Wild West” grounds your abstract concepts in observable history, showing how sovereignty and liberty can exist without centralized control. - Hunter-gatherer societies are used effectively to illustrate natural alignment with Law and the Creator. # Western philosophy framing Connecting the principle “The Creator is always above the created” to causality, authority, and natural law is elegant. You show the metaphysical foundation of sovereignty in a way that anticipates modern legal and political thought. # Smooth transitions from philosophy to practical implications - From universal Law → sovereignty → liberty → accountability → governance. - This keeps the reader following a logical thread from abstract to practical. # Tone and accessibility The chapter maintains an authoritative but inviting tone, making complex philosophical ideas understandable without oversimplifying.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)