Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68fceef0-7248-8013-bf5d-581461dec5bc
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: I rechecked against solid sources — there’s no essential calculation missing for your pass/fail logic. === Short answer: I rechecked against solid sources — there’s no essential calculation missing for your pass/fail logic. Your methods align with standard references. * Pitch → size/teeth spacing: DP & Module relations and circular pitch are correct for deriving pinion diameter/radius and rack tooth count. gearsolutions.com<ref>{{cite web|title=gearsolutions.com|url=https://khkgears.net/new/gear_knowledge/gear-nomenclature/diametral-pitch.html|publisher=khkgears.net|access-date=2025-11-15}}</ref> * Torque ↔ line force: Using F=τ/rF=\tau/rF=τ/r at the drum/pinion is standard. Apex Dynamics<ref>{{cite web|title=Apex Dynamics|url=https://www.apexdyna.nl/en/news/calculate-rack-and-pinion|publisher=Apex Dynamics|access-date=2025-11-15}}</ref> * Static breakaway vs running losses: Treating a starting torque threshold distinct from running efficiency is correct per bearing practice; our “auto τs” is a reasonable parametric stand-in for SKF’s fuller model. SKF<ref>{{cite web|title=SKF|url=https://www.skf.com/group/products/rolling-bearings/principles-of-rolling-bearing-selection/bearing-selection-process/operating-temperature-and-speed/bearing-friction-power-loss-and-starting-torque?Information=true|publisher=skf.com|access-date=2025-11-15}}</ref> * Angle/projection “loss”: Using the cosine of the deviation to compute effective driving component is textbook. If you want optional refinements later (not required for your Yes/No outcome): * Add a mesh efficiency knob tied to pressure angle/μ (spur/rack typically ~94–98%+, high-quality closer to 98–99%). www.cedengineering.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=www.cedengineering.ca|url=https://www.cedengineering.ca/userfiles/M06-031%20-%20Basic%20Fundamentals%20of%20Gear%20Drives.pdf|publisher=cedengineering.ca|access-date=2025-11-15}}</ref> * If desired, include pulley efficiency (large ball-bearing sheaves ~85–90% each) inside the overall efficiency instead of assuming ideal pulleys. ropelab.com.au<ref>{{cite web|title=ropelab.com.au|url=https://www.ropelab.com.au/pulley-efficiency/|publisher=ropelab.com.au|access-date=2025-11-15}}</ref> But for now: your calculator’s current torque, friction, tension/angle, and pass/fail checks are complete and properly grounded.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)