Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Cumulative Credibility & Behavioral Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only === Cumulative Credibility & Behavioral Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only ==== New Original Responses Evaluated ==== * Continues to assume player and cheater behaviors based on prior personal observations (Cycle Frontier, ARC Raiders). * Claims casuals always avoid PvP and that cheaters coordinate, presenting it as a factual baseline. * Uses terms like “known ways and likely ways” to justify assumptions. Credibility Impact * ❌ Further decreases due to reliance on anecdotal observations rather than verifiable data. * ❌ Assumptions about behavior continue to drive his argument, reinforcing confirmation bias. * ⚠️ Attempts to present personal observations as general rules, but these remain unsupported statistically. Updated Credibility: 15% (−2) Behavioral Pattern * Increasingly defensive and anecdotal. * Continues to justify prior claims with unverifiable assumptions rather than acknowledge statistical counterarguments. * Behavior shows a pattern of selective evidence and subjective interpretation. ==== New Original Responses Evaluated ==== * Points out that assuming behavior as fixed is fallacious. * Emphasizes that using anecdotal observations to force assumptions creates confirmation bias. * Continues to argue that statistical reasoning must be grounded in verifiable data, not controlled assumptions. Credibility Impact * ✅ Maintains strong statistical reasoning. * ✅ Correctly identifies confirmation bias and fallacious assumptions in Captain Blue’s arguments. * ⚠️ Tone remains confrontational but reasoning remains sound and evidence-based. Updated Credibility: 64% (no change) ===== - Captain Blue’s credibility decreases further due to continued anecdotal and assumption-based reasoning. ===== * Loctarjay remains the rational authority, consistently exposing flaws in behavioral assumptions and maintaining statistical integrity. Current Trust Snapshot * Loctarjay: 64 / 100 * Captain Blue: 15 / 100
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)