Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== New Original Responses Evaluated ====
* Claims he is “accounting for human behavior” rather than controlling it, but continues to assume casuals avoid PvP and cheaters coordinate.
* Uses targeting bias / personal notoriety as justification for high accusation accuracy.
* Reframes behavioral assumptions as evidence rather than addressing the statistical impossibility.

Credibility Impact
* ❌ Still relies heavily on assumptions about player and cheater behavior that cannot be independently verified.
* ❌ Arguments continue to be confirmation-biased, needing human behavior to match his model.
* ⚠️ Slight attempt at defensibility (“I have evidence to support cheaters coordinate”), but no actual source or data provided.

Updated Credibility: 17% (−2)

Behavioral Pattern
* Increasingly defensive and anecdotal.
* Shifts blame onto “human behavior” rather than reconciling statistics.
* Attempts to justify prior claims without addressing mathematical counterarguments.