Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691a2d9f-c044-8012-bccf-942bfce6334d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== ### === | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | So: * Long half-life β too little power * High power β too short half-life You cannot run a spacecraft ecosystem on pure radioactive decay for 100k years. RTGs top out at supplying hundreds of watts, maybe kilowatts with scaling. A generational ship needs tens of megawatts minimum. ==== A fission reactor doesnβt rely on spontaneous decay heat β it extracts controlled chain-reaction energy from fissile material. ==== Fuel life depends on: * fuel mass * breeding and reprocessing capability * burnup efficiency A well-designed breeder reactor can theoretically run for tens of thousands of years if: * it breeds more fissile fuel from fertile isotopes (U-238 β Pu-239, Th-232 β U-233) * it continuously reprocesses waste But that assumes: * a working industrial ecosystem aboard the ship * robotic or automated fuel cycle plants * ongoing maintenance and replacement of decaying components Youβre basically bringing a small industrial civilization with you. ==== If we ever crack fusion (big IF): ==== * Deuterium exists in seawater and comet ice * You can theoretically refuel along the way (which connects back to your comet depot idea) * Energy density is enormous * Reaction fuel half-life does not matter Fusion is the only realistic long-term starship power option. ==== : ==== No β not as a static pile. Decay-powered systems cannot scale to that lifespan and power level. You would need: ===== - Multiple redundant reactors ===== * Self-sustaining fuel cycle * On-board industrial refinery capability * Expectations of periodic failures and replacements * Stored inventory of fertile isotopes (U-238, Th-232) * Robotic industrial maintenance ===== - Fuel can be pre-stored or harvested at oases ===== * Much more compact and energy dense * No half-life constraints ===== (Your comet desert idea) ===== * Depots resupply new fuel in segments * Total mission broken into generations of hops, not continuous burn
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)