Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Cumulative Credibility & Behavioral Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only === Cumulative Credibility & Behavioral Update — Quotes Excluded, Responses Only ==== New Original Responses Evaluated ==== * Continues to defend assumed cheater percentages (30–42%) without verifiable sources. * Introduces player behavior and PvP avoidance as additional factors to reduce the required cheater rate for his claims. * Claims 95% report accuracy can coexist with lower cheater percentages due to coordination and targeting bias. * Maintains narrative that his reporting is “likely accurate” despite statistical impossibility shown by Loctarjay. Credibility Impact * ❌ Continues speculative reasoning: uses unverified “player behavior” assumptions to justify claims. * ❌ Evades direct probability critique by adding complex behavioral factors instead of addressing statistical impossibility. * ⚠️ Slight improvement in internal consistency: acknowledges that accounting for coordination / avoidance reduces the required cheater percentage. Updated Credibility: 19% (−2) Behavioral Pattern * Increasingly relies on hypothetical adjustments to defend claims. * Avoids admitting errors; reframes evidence to fit preconceptions. * Overweights anecdotal experience and selective modeling. ==== New Original Responses Evaluated ==== * Maintains focus on mathematically testing plausibility of Captain Blue’s claims. * Explicitly calculates minimum cheater percentages required for 95% or 80% accusation accuracy with average 2-enemy encounters. * Critiques all behavioral justifications as irrelevant to statistical reality. * Continues to demand clear, reproducible evidence. Credibility Impact * ✅ Consistently applies probability and statistics to evaluate claims. * ✅ Demonstrates ability to quantify the statistical impossibility of the claimed encounter rates. * ⚠️ Tone is harsh but reasoning remains rigorous and evidence-focused. Updated Credibility: 64% (no change) ===== - Captain Blue continues to decline due to unverified assumptions and over-reliance on behavioral justifications. ===== * Loctarjay maintains credibility, reinforcing the statistical impossibility of Captain Blue’s claims. Current Trust Snapshot * Loctarjay: 64 / 100 * Captain Blue: 19 / 100
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)