Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== - The justification: The U.S. government claims these vessels belonged to “narco‑terrorists” and part of a non-international armed conflict; critics argue there is no publicly disclosed evidence showing the boats were actively engaged in armed hostilities, or that the people aboard posed a threat requiring lethal force. Poynter Institute<ref>{{cite web|title=Poynter Institute|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/us-military-strike-venezuelan-drug-vessel-legal-questions/|publisher=Poynter Institute|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> ==== * The status of those aboard: In at least one strike, reports say survivors were present — and reportedly killed in a follow‑up strike. That raises serious legal and human‑rights issues because under international humanitarian law and the laws of armed conflict, attacking shipwrecked or incapacitated persons is prohibited. Reuters<ref>{{cite web|title=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/are-deadly-us-strikes-alleged-drug-vessels-legal-2025-10-31/|publisher=reuters.com|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * Transparency: The government has not publicly released full evidence linking targeted vessels to drug‑trafficking networks (such as cargo manifests, chain-of-custody of seized drugs, criminal indictments). Many details remain classified or unverified in public reporting. Al Jazeera<ref>{{cite web|title=Al Jazeera|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/6/can-us-strikes-on-suspected-drug-boats-off-venezuela-be-legally-justified|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * International law concerns: Human‑rights organizations and international‑law experts argue the campaign sets a dangerous precedent — using military force under the “war on drugs” label in ways that could violate state sovereignty, maritime law, and human‑rights norms. Poynter Institute<ref>{{cite web|title=Poynter Institute|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/us-military-strike-venezuelan-drug-vessel-legal-questions/|publisher=Poynter Institute|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)