Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay saying ""This shows how WRONG you are in your confirmation biased questioning.and showing… ===
Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay saying ""This shows how WRONG you are in your confirmation biased questioning.(and showing the 2 screenshots)"
To which Captain Blue responds with:
"The question wasn't running into the cheater but a cheater being in the game. That's why the question being asked was where the state would change."

Captain Blue continues to quote Loctarjay "The amount of players you meet in a match does DRASTICALLY determine how many "cheaters" YOU SPECIFICALLY run into, which is what YOU base your Preprogrammed World View on...."
To this Captain Blue responds with: "None of these questions were asked on stream. You're acting like I was asking about cheaters being run into not how many were in game.

You're claiming confirmation bias but you're claiming a context that wasn't being made. I already asked AI on the likely hood of running into a cheater based on the factors you keep ignoring.

-Cheaters are likely to kill off players and move around the map faster than regular players. Meaning you are more likely to run into a cheater then a legit player due to the efficiency they move around with wall hacks.

-If you kill players then you also increase the chance of running into a cheater.

-Going to high loot areas will increase the odds of running into a cheater.

-Staying in the raid longer will increase the odds of running into a cheater because cheaters would more likely stay longer in raid for kills and higher end loot.
* Having good gear and loot would also attract cheaters to come to you.
* Having solos teaming that are not cheating will deter a solo cheater from going for them and go for easier solo prey.

-Cheaters use code names or methods to communicate like the Tarkov wiggle so they can identify other cheaters and avoid them increasing the odds they will run into you.

You keep ignoring all these logical arguments because you just want to look at the on the surface numbers which is just hypocritical because you people have been telling me I'm not looking at the stats with details but he you are doing the thing you claim I do."