Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== User: Instead of using the reduced Planck Constant ħ or h bar could you used h/2π? ===
Instead of using the reduced Planck Constant ħ or h bar could you used h/2π? This makes it easier to see the geometry, when we don't use the reduced Planck Constant ħ or h bar but instead use h/2π. We would then have 2π that can represent geometry in the form of a diameter of a sphere 4πr². I am not sure if the maths is right but, If we square the reduced Planck Constant ħ²=h²/4π we have 4π representing the geometry of a physical process that depends on a spherical surface.  

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle between energy and time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π ~ 2πr circler geometry or ∆E ∆t ≥ h²/4π spherical 4πr² geometry. 

Planck constant h/2π linked with 2π ~ minimum 2πr circumference, with the centre of the sphere, atomic nucleus, forming a constant of action relative to radius square r², the electron sphere of probability that surrounds the nucleus and the minimum 2πr circumference. This forms the Planck constant h/2π. In mainstream theoretical physics, they came up with the idea of the reduced Planck constant ħ or h-bar just to get rid of the 2pi so the equations would be more compact.

In this theory we have a Planck constant h/2π linked with 2π because a one-dimensional photon ∆E=hf electron spherical oscillation is formed by the one-dimensional spherical 4πr² surface. 
ħ = h/2π ~ ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π ~ ħ² = h²/4π ~ ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π