Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Good question. === Good question. Here’s a breakdown of what I — and public reporting as of now — know (and don’t know) about the alleged United States military bombing of boats tied to Venezuela. The story is real in the sense there are public allegations and reporting — but it is still extremely controversial, legally murky, and being intensely questioned. ==== - According to multiple recent reports, the U.S. has carried out military strikes on boats alleged to be Venezuelan drug‑smuggling vessels since September 2025 as part of a broader anti‑drug / “narco‑terrorism” campaign. PBS<ref>{{cite web|title=PBS|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_military_strikes_on_alleged_drug_traffickers|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> ==== * One of the strikes — on September 2, 2025 — has drawn heavy scrutiny because after the initial attack, U.S. forces reportedly carried out a so‑called “second‑tap” strike: a follow‑up strike targeting survivors in the water or shipwrecked individuals. Reuters<ref>{{cite web|title=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/white-house-admiral-approved-second-strike-boat-venezuela-was-well-within-legal-2025-12-01/|publisher=reuters.com|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * Official statements from U.S. leadership (in the current administration) frame these strikes as part of a war on “narco‑terrorists,” i.e. trafficking organizations — a justification for using military force rather than standard law‑enforcement. Foreign Policy<ref>{{cite web|title=Foreign Policy|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/09/04/trump-venezuela-drug-boat-strike-us-military-narcoterrorism/|publisher=Foreign Policy|date=2025-09-04|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * The U.S. military reportedly employed airstrikes and naval fire against these vessels. Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_military_strikes_on_alleged_drug_traffickers|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * The activity has provoked widespread international and domestic condemnation: - United Nations Human Rights Office (via its High Commissioner) called the strikes “unacceptable,” demanding independent, transparent investigations. Al Jazeera<ref>{{cite web|title=Al Jazeera|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/31/un-human-rights-chief-says-us-strikes-on-alleged-drug-boats-unacceptable|publisher=Al Jazeera|date=2025-10-31|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> - Several legal scholars and international‑law experts question the legality of using lethal military force against vessels suspected of trafficking drugs — given that drug trafficking is normally a criminal offense, not an act of war. Poynter Institute<ref>{{cite web|title=Poynter Institute|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/us-military-strike-venezuelan-drug-vessel-legal-questions/|publisher=Poynter Institute|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> - Critics argue striking small vessels suspected of trafficking — especially if there’s no clear imminent threat — blurs the line between law enforcement and warfare. Al Jazeera<ref>{{cite web|title=Al Jazeera|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/6/can-us-strikes-on-suspected-drug-boats-off-venezuela-be-legally-justified|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> So yes — there is public, credible‑source reporting that U.S. military forces have bombed boats alleged to be Venezuelan drug vessels. ==== - The justification: The U.S. government claims these vessels belonged to “narco‑terrorists” and part of a non-international armed conflict; critics argue there is no publicly disclosed evidence showing the boats were actively engaged in armed hostilities, or that the people aboard posed a threat requiring lethal force. Poynter Institute<ref>{{cite web|title=Poynter Institute|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/us-military-strike-venezuelan-drug-vessel-legal-questions/|publisher=Poynter Institute|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> ==== * The status of those aboard: In at least one strike, reports say survivors were present — and reportedly killed in a follow‑up strike. That raises serious legal and human‑rights issues because under international humanitarian law and the laws of armed conflict, attacking shipwrecked or incapacitated persons is prohibited. Reuters<ref>{{cite web|title=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/are-deadly-us-strikes-alleged-drug-vessels-legal-2025-10-31/|publisher=reuters.com|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * Transparency: The government has not publicly released full evidence linking targeted vessels to drug‑trafficking networks (such as cargo manifests, chain-of-custody of seized drugs, criminal indictments). Many details remain classified or unverified in public reporting. Al Jazeera<ref>{{cite web|title=Al Jazeera|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/6/can-us-strikes-on-suspected-drug-boats-off-venezuela-be-legally-justified|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> * International law concerns: Human‑rights organizations and international‑law experts argue the campaign sets a dangerous precedent — using military force under the “war on drugs” label in ways that could violate state sovereignty, maritime law, and human‑rights norms. Poynter Institute<ref>{{cite web|title=Poynter Institute|url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/us-military-strike-venezuelan-drug-vessel-legal-questions/|publisher=Poynter Institute|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> ==== - The attacks — strikes on vessels — are clearly happening and publicly admitted. ==== * The justifications (narco‑terrorism, self‑defense, non‑international armed conflict) are contested by legal experts and many international institutions. * Accountability, transparency, and verification — what you’d expect for military operations of this magnitude — are still lacking or classified for many details (e.g. exact identities of those killed, proof of drug cargo, chain of custody). * Given that ambiguity, it’s valid to treat these as alleged strikes against alleged smugglers — while demanding full public records, evidence, and international scrutiny. If you like, I can pull up 5–10 of the strongest, most credible reporting threads on this issue (with dates, outlets, and main claims) so you have a baseline. That way you can see exactly which facts are agreed on by most reliable media — and which are still disputed or unverified. Further reading on U.S.–Venezuela boat strikesReutersDid the US military commit a war crime in boat attack off Venezuela?Today<ref>{{cite web|title=ReutersDid the US military commit a war crime in boat attack off Venezuela?Today|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/are-deadly-us-strikes-alleged-drug-vessels-legal-2025-10-31/|publisher=ReutersDid the US military commit a war crime in boat attack off Venezuela?Today|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>CBS NewsHow the Trump administration's account of Sept. 2 boat strike has evolved2 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=CBS NewsHow the Trump administration's account of Sept. 2 boat strike has evolved2 days ago|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/boat-strike-sept-2-trump-administration-statements/|publisher=CBS NewsHow the Trump administration's account of Sept. 2 boat strike has evolved2 days ago|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>The GuardianKilling of survivors sparks outrage - but entire US 'drug boat' war is legally shakyToday<ref>{{cite web|title=The GuardianKilling of survivors sparks outrage - but entire US 'drug boat' war is legally shakyToday|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/04/venezuela-boat-strikes-legality-hegseth|publisher=The GuardianKilling of survivors sparks outrage - but entire US 'drug boat' war is legally shakyToday|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>War on the RocksAttacking Drug Boats: Bending or Breaking the Law?Yesterday<ref>{{cite web|title=War on the RocksAttacking Drug Boats: Bending or Breaking the Law?Yesterday|url=https://warontherocks.com/2025/12/attacking-drug-boats-bending-or-breaking-the-law/|publisher=War on the RocksAttacking Drug Boats: Bending or Breaking the Law?Yesterday|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>PBSWhite House says U.S. fired twice at alleged drug boat, raising bipartisan legal concerns2 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=PBSWhite House says U.S. fired twice at alleged drug boat, raising bipartisan legal concerns2 days ago|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/white-house-says-u-s-fired-twice-at-alleged-drug-boat-raising-bipartisan-legal-concerns|publisher=PBSWhite House says U.S. fired twice at alleged drug boat, raising bipartisan legal concerns2 days ago|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>The Washington PostHegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all6 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=The Washington PostHegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all6 days ago|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/11/28/hegseth-kill-them-all-survivors-boat-strike/|publisher=The Washington PostHegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all6 days ago|date=2025-11-28|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>AP NewsExperts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike3 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=AP NewsExperts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike3 days ago|url=https://apnews.com/article/72b0a498ca08615b2589c772a1d9e642|publisher=AP NewsExperts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike3 days ago|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>ReutersWhite House defends US attack on boat from Venezuela as lawful2 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=ReutersWhite House defends US attack on boat from Venezuela as lawful2 days ago|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/white-house-admiral-approved-second-strike-boat-venezuela-was-well-within-legal-2025-12-01/|publisher=ReutersWhite House defends US attack on boat from Venezuela as lawful2 days ago|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>The Washington PostTrump's boat strike playbook was written by ObamaToday<ref>{{cite web|title=The Washington PostTrump's boat strike playbook was written by ObamaToday|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/12/04/trump-hegseths-drug-boat-strike-obama/|publisher=The Washington PostTrump's boat strike playbook was written by ObamaToday|date=2025-12-04|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>Al JazeeraTrump’s boat bombings: How the US has long used ‘double-tap’ strikesYesterday<ref>{{cite web|title=Al JazeeraTrump’s boat bombings: How the US has long used ‘double-tap’ strikesYesterday|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/2/trumps-boat-bombings-how-the-us-has-long-used-double-tap-strikes|publisher=Al JazeeraTrump’s boat bombings: How the US has long used ‘double-tap’ strikesYesterday|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)