Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Loctarjay quotes himself saying "The fact that you started your response and continued your response with blatant lies,β¦ === Loctarjay quotes himself saying "The fact that you started your response and continued your response with blatant lies, it only makes sense to ignore the rest of your response being that would also be lies to the end" And then Loctarjay expands with: "And Joe... Do you know what the absolutely MOST ILLOGICAL THING IS.... The fact that you claim you can spot "subtle cheaters" while doing this: (adding 6 screenshots of 6 different matches in a row, where Captain Blue reports every single player that killed him in the matches) This here proves that you are using the old school method of "Spray and Pray" rather than knowing what it is you're talking about...... Your style of reporting is so ignorant and generic, that it looks like it's created by a bot mass-reporting everyone by pick-and-choosing from keywords and not actual actions. Joe: "But I do give my logic on stream" * Your "logic" is so flawed that something as basic as standard ingame mechanics can explain the 100% exact same thing, which means you have NO ARGUMENT Joe: "You are just ignoring the facts shown to you" * No, the "facts" you are talking about are only "factual" after applying your fabricated story to them, because the moment you are using INGAME MECHANICS your "facts" mean nothing at all Joe: "Nuh uh, that is just your claim" * This is factual evidence derived from your own active behavior done live on stream, there is no "claim" about what I am saying seeing that what I am saying are indisputably what happens, and we can easily go through it by using True or False: Is Hunt: Showdown (which is shown in the screenshots) a Match Making Game where you have the possibility to encounter any number of enemies up to the maximum per match which are 12 players, thus 11 enemies when you play solo??? * TRUE In case it needs to be SUBTLE CHEATING, and not blatant hacking like speed-hack, super aimbotting everyone down through the entire map and such... Is it true or false, that an enemy hunter NEEDS to actively get close to you from a distance, because if he just teleported directly to your location or you at any given moment changed your viewing direction, he would be exposed as a blatant hacker??? * TRUE TRUE OR FALSE...... Are you calling roughly 98% of EVERYONE you encounter that kills you in any pvp shooter, or roughly 80% that even remotely shoots at you, for "cheaters"????? * TRUE TRUE OR FALSE............ Are you not using VOIP in the game Arc Raiders, 99.9% of the time you die and screaming like a 12yo "Wallhacker... cheater... sad little b**** cheater" ????? * TRUE Derived from these FACTUAL AND INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCES, it logically makes 0 sense to believe you know anything remotely close to what "subtle cheating" looks like, even more seeing that you are not even encountering 50% of the possible enemies on average and 98% of all your deaths can be explained with ingame mechanics, to which you NEVER have any other counter argument to other than "but you are ignoring what I am saying" which is 100% irrelevant the moment we objectively looks at what purely happened and what purely are possible."
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)