Editing Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3 (section)

==== If I can locate at least two of the following, I would shift from “skeptical / unverified” to “confirmed”: ====
# A stable archive (e.g. Wayback Machine) of the FBI page with the same text you referenced — showing it existed and was later modified or removed (proof it was real).
# Mainstream, widely respected media coverage (e.g. wire services, large-national outlets, legal-reporting sources) with archived versions that reference the shooting, name the victim, suspect, date, place, and confirm death.
# Public court records: charges, indictment documents, trial schedule, plea or conviction (assuming investigation advanced).
# Public death-record entry (death certificate, obituary in a recognized funeral home or public registry) tied to Charlie Kirk.
# Multiple independent eyewitness accounts, videos, and preserved media — ideally timestamped and geolocated, not alone social-media reposts.

Without those, I have to treat the entire narrative as untenable, even if some “official-looking” traces remain.

If you want — I’ll try to grab live snapshots (via archive.org or similar) of every page you and I have cited — and build a “source-validity matrix”: each row = a source, each column = verification criterion (archive, media corroboration, third-party record, etc.). That will show exactly how thin or strong the public record really is.