Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695e35ca-c9c0-8003-8b44-8517505d1bda
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Great question. === Great question. Short answer: in a written, formal register, the collocations are usually those pairs that are: * denotative and technical rather than emotional * semantically selective (the adjective fits a specific subtype of the noun) * stable in specialized writing (science, policy, legal, academic prose) * not merely any adjective + noun, but show restricted combinability Let’s go through the pairs you showed and divide them. ==== 🟢 Strong collocations for formal written English ==== These sound fully natural in academic / policy / technical prose: * drug-related accident * nuclear-plant accident * unreported accident ===== ✔ Why these count as collocations ===== # restricted meaning - “drug-related accident” is not simply “an accident that happens to involve drugs” — it’s a recognized category in public health and criminology. # low substitutability - you don’t usually say drug-connected accident or drug-linked accident in formal writing # domain-specific usage - these occur in medicine, safety engineering, transportation studies, insurance, etc. # informational, not emotional - these adjectives classify rather than evaluate These are close to terminological collocations (sometimes bordering on technical terms). ==== 🟡 Acceptable, but context-dependent formal collocations ==== These may count as collocations in specialized disciplines: * underwater accident (diving / naval / marine safety context) * typical accident (risk analysis, case classification) * occasional accident (epidemiology / child development reporting) These are: * less fixed than the first group * still formal in tone * classificatory rather than emotional They tend to occur where the writer is doing taxonomy or categorization of accidents. ==== 🔴 Not collocations in formal written English (informal or evaluative) ==== These are generally not considered formal collocations: * big accident * terrible accident * spectacular accident ===== ✘ Why these are not preferred in formal writing ===== * evaluative or emotional - “terrible” and “spectacular” express attitude, not classification * informal register - “big accident” is conversation-level; formal writing uses major/serious accident * journalistic flavor - “spectacular accident” occurs in headlines, not academic prose Even if frequent, they reflect register mismatch, so they are not “collocations of formal written English.” : In formal writing, you would expect: : : major accident : : serious accident : rather than big accident or terrible accident ==== 🟣 Special note: atomic accident ==== * borderline / uncommon today * historically used (1950s–1970s) * now replaced by nuclear accident * feels dated or non-technical in current formal writing So: it is collocationally meaningful, but diachronically restricted. ==== ✅ Rules of thumb for deciding collocations in formal writing ==== A pair counts as a collocation in formal written registers if: * it shows semantic specialization (classifies a subtype) * cannot be freely replaced by synonyms * occurs in technical or institutional texts * lacks emotional coloring * expresses what kind of X, not how the writer feels about X Compare: | Pair | Register | Collocation status | | ---------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------ | | drug-related accident | formal/technical | strong collocation | | nuclear-plant accident | formal/technical | strong collocation | | unreported accident | formal/legal/admin | strong collocation | | underwater accident | technical context | medium | | typical accident | academic analysis | medium | | big accident | informal speech | no | | terrible accident | emotional narrative | no | | spectacular accident | journalistic | no | ===== If you’d like, I can also: ===== * compute MI/t-score collocation strength if you give counts * map these to register labels (spoken, fiction, news, academic) * suggest better academic alternatives (e.g., major vs big, severe vs terrible) * extract formal collocations from your file automatically Just tell me which direction you want to go.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)