Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69327c2a-c7a0-800d-ba06-8aabc23238c3
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== B 的核心立場可以拆成幾塊: ===== # 社會本質與信任 - 認為人類社會的本質是「信任」,而信任是所有合作的基石。 - 如果將詐欺除罪化,會動搖整個「契約與交換」的穩定性。 # 從日常契約推演詐欺除罪化的結果 - 舉例:公司不發薪水、早餐店沒加蛋,都是違反承諾的騙局。 - 若詐欺除罪化,等於釋放了「破壞契約」的誘因與成本結構。 # 社會發展與多元性 - 指出: - 「擅長欺騙」與「拿諾貝爾獎」並非同一種能力,也不是同一批人。 - 以欺騙作為主導選拔標準,不會促進多元,而是抑制多元。 - 結論:詐欺除罪化不會帶來整體進化,反而造成退化。 總結:B 把詐欺問題拉回「信任/契約/合作」這套社會科學與政治哲學中的王道語彙,論證的是「制度與長期社會秩序」而不是短期個體智商的勝敗。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)