Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== - Credibility: Moderate, reasoning partially grounded. - Emphasizes binary truth values (true/false) as a defense against nuanced critique. - Maintains a rigid framework, prioritizing absolutes over conditional or probabilistic thinking. ===== * Behavioral Patterns: - Defensive: Responds to critiques by asserting foundational principles rather than engaging with nuance. - Rigid: Relies on fixed categories (true/false) to simplify complex scenarios. - Dismissive of nuance: Treats criticisms of reasoning style as secondary to asserting correctness. - Short, declarative responses: Prefers statements of principle over elaboration, contrasting Loctarjay’s detailed analysis. Overall Impression: Loctarjay demonstrates logical precision, critique of oversimplification, and structured argumentation. Captain Blue exhibits rigid thinking, binary framing, and defensiveness, which can obscure nuanced assessment of claims. Both show consistency in their respective approaches, but credibility is higher for Loctarjay in analytical contexts, while Captain Blue relies on principle-based defense rather than empirical logic.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)