Editing Openai/6959ed27-accc-800e-8e87-21aa81e93c07 (section)

======================================================================

KEY FINDINGS:
# SPEED: The curvature-based method is generally competitive with Newton's
   method, and can be faster due to avoiding trigonometric functions.
# CONVERGENCE: The curvature method typically converges in 3-4 iterations
   for most points, similar to Newton's method.
# ROBUSTNESS: The curvature method avoids numerical issues near the axes
   that can affect Newton's method.
# SIMPLICITY: The curvature method has a simpler loop structure and
   avoids expensive trig evaluations (sin/cos) in the main loop.
# ACCURACY: Both methods achieve machine precision accuracy (1e-15 to 1e-16
   error from the ellipse equation).

The key insight of 0xfaded's method is using the LOCAL CURVATURE of the 
ellipse to approximate it as a circle, giving excellent update steps that
converge rapidly without requiring trigonometric functions.

This is a elegant geometric approach that leverages the evolute (curve of
centers of curvature) to achieve fast, stable convergence.

Interesting! In pure Python, Newton's method is actually faster than the curvature method. This is because Python's math.cos and math.sin are implemented in C and are highly optimized. The advantage of avoiding trig functions would be more apparent in:

    A compiled language like C/C++ or Rust where the loop overhead is lower
    SIMD-vectorized implementations
    GPU implementations

Let me create a comparison that shows where the curvature method really shines - namely in a lower-level implementation. I'll also highlight the key aspects: robustness and predictable iteration count.

Interesting! Python's optimized math.cos/sin (implemented in C) make Newton's method competitive. Let me create a more comprehensive analysis showing where the curvature method truly shines:

bash
cd /home/claude && python comprehensive_analysis.py

Output