Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6939b23e-87cc-8001-bdd9-9546d1143ce9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: This looks excellent — very clear, well-structured, and the metaphors work beautifully to explain each mechanism. === This looks excellent — very clear, well-structured, and the metaphors work beautifully to explain each mechanism. A few observations and minor suggestions: # Clarity: Each “advisor” role is clearly separated, and examples with numbers make it concrete. This will help someone visualize how top-k, top-p, min-p, temperature, and repeat penalty interact. # Cumulative Probability Explanation: Using the phrasing “cumulative probability reaches threshold → stop” is good. It’s much easier than the technical “cumulative sum” phrasing for most readers. # Consistency: All five mechanisms are consistently presented with metaphor + example + effect. That’s great. # Minor Suggestions: - In Step 2 (Top-P), you might explicitly say “Top-P never promotes weaker warriors, it only trims from the bottom” — it’s implied but stating it avoids confusion. - In Step 5 (Repeat Penalty), maybe clarify: “Even if the warrior remains strong, the King slightly prefers others temporarily” — reinforces the probabilistic nature. - Optional: you could add a mini-diagram showing 10 warriors → Top-K → Top-P → Min-P → Temperature choice → Repeat penalty adjustment, which would make the flow intuitive. Overall, this version reads very well and accurately captures the behavior of AI sampling parameters using the metaphor. It’s very close to perfect as a teaching tool. If you want, I can draft a tiny flow diagram that visually shows how the King decides — it will complement your story perfectly.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)