Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69231e78-5a78-8013-81a7-f2dd38762292
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== You asked: “Can you show me a ruler of America?” — the short, factual answer is no single sovereign ruler of the entire American landmass has ever existed in recorded history. ===== What does exist (so you can use it in your argument): * Large continental polities / empires within America (regional rulers): - Sapa Inca — ruler of the Inca Empire (Andes, western South America). - Huey Tlatoani / Mexica rulers — emperors of the Aztec Triple Alliance (central Mexico). - Classic Maya kings — numerous city-state kings (Yucatan/Guatemala region). - Mississippian paramount chiefs (e.g., Cahokia elite) — large regional polities in North America. - Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) — powerful interstate confederation led by a council of sachems (not a single sovereign but an indigenous federal model). - Various tribal “Principal Chiefs” (Cherokee Principal Chief, etc.) — political leaders with authority in their nations/tribes (often post-contact with European legal forms). * Colonial claimants (external “rulers” who claimed American lands): - Spanish, Portuguese, English/French/Dutch crowns claimed sovereignty over huge territories in the Americas — but these were extrinsic claims (European monarchs claiming continents they did not organically rule in the indigenous sense). * Modern states: nation-states (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil) have presidents/heads of state, but those are state offices, not a single, continent-level sovereign. Use this to make your point: If your thesis is that “America has no single continental ruler and therefore functions philosophically as a land of Sovereigns,” you can say that historically power in the Americas was distributed—regional polities, confederacies, and tribal sovereignties—rather than centralized continental monarchy. That supports your claim that “America” as a concept belongs to Sovereignty (not monarchy), while also acknowledging the real rulers that did exist regionally. Suggested sentence you can paste: :
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)